Apple iPhone 17e vs Vivo X300 Ultra

Apple iPhone 17e

Apple

7.5

Capable, but the iPhone 17 is right there

Vivo X300 Ultra

Vivo

8.7

The video and zoom monster

Apple iPhone 17e

What Reviewers Agree On

MagSafe is back — the single biggest fix vs the 16e, enabling 15W wireless charging and the entire Apple magnetic accessory ecosystem.
Base storage doubles from 128GB to 256GB at the same $599 price, instantly making the phone a better deal than last year.
The A19 chip delivers flagship-tier performance for the price, outscoring far more expensive Android phones in CPU benchmarks.
Ceramic Shield 2 brings 3× better scratch resistance plus an anti-reflective coating, finally putting the cheap iPhone on the same glass as the rest of the 17 lineup.
Battery life comfortably lasts a full day for most users, with reviewers regularly ending with 15-50% charge left over.

Pros & Cons

Apple iPhone 17e

Pros

MagSafe is back — the single biggest fix vs the 16e, enabling 15W wireless charging and the entire Apple magnetic accessory ecosystem.
Base storage doubles from 128GB to 256GB at the same $599 price, instantly making the phone a better deal than last year.
The A19 chip delivers flagship-tier performance for the price, outscoring far more expensive Android phones in CPU benchmarks.
Ceramic Shield 2 brings 3× better scratch resistance plus an anti-reflective coating, finally putting the cheap iPhone on the same glass as the rest of the 17 lineup.

Detailed Comparison

Display

Apple iPhone 17e

The 6.1-inch Super Retina XDR OLED is identical in resolution, brightness and refresh rate to the 16e — 60Hz, no ProMotion, no Dynamic Island, and a peak brightness measured by Trusted Reviews at around 750 nits. The single concrete display upgrade is Ceramic Shield 2 glass with an anti-reflective coating. Every reviewer flags 60Hz in 2026 as the panel's biggest weakness, especially since Apple finally brought ProMotion to the $799 iPhone 17.

Lack of an always-on display is one of the top things missed when using the 17e — no Live Activities at a glance, no bedside clock mode, no Dynamic Island to surface order updates.
Apple still uses a 60Hz refresh rate when 120Hz is now standard at this price — the smoother screen is one of those things that's hard to appreciate until you experience it, and hard to go back from.
The OLED screen itself is standard base iPhone fare — bright enough, but the max 750 nits measured is below the iPhone 17 by quite some margin, noticeable outdoors in bright sun.

TechTalkTown may earn a commission from purchases made through links below. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. This does not influence our reviews. Learn more.

Buy Apple iPhone 17e

AmazonCheck price

Buy Vivo X300 Ultra

People Also Compare

Apple iPhone 17e vs Motorola Razr Fold Motorola Razr Fold vs Vivo X300 Ultra Apple iPhone 17e vs Oppo Find X9 Ultra Oppo Find X9 Ultra vs Vivo X300 Ultra Apple iPhone 17e vs Google Pixel 10a Google Pixel 10a vs Vivo X300 Ultra Apple iPhone 17e vs Nothing Phone (4a) Pro Nothing Phone (4a) Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra Apple iPhone 17e vs OnePlus 15T OnePlus 15T vs Vivo X300 Ultra Apple iPhone 17e vs Nothing Phone (4a)

Browse all reviews

Deal Breakers

The 60Hz display in 2026 is the universally cited deal-breaker — every reviewer says cheap Android phones now ship with 120Hz and the regular iPhone 17 has ProMotion at $200 more.
Only one rear camera — no ultrawide — limits framing for group shots, landscapes, tight indoor scenes, and tasks where the Pixel 10a's second lens is genuinely useful.
The iPhone 17 is just $200 more and unlocks ProMotion, Dynamic Island, always-on display, an ultrawide, the new 24MP square selfie camera, and a slightly larger sensor — most reviewers say the $200 step-up is the one to take.
No Ultra Wideband (UWB) chip means precision-finding AirTags and other UWB accessories don't fully work — a strange omission on a current Apple phone.
Same 12MP selfie camera as the 16e — no Center Stage, no square sensor, no automatic landscape switching that's on every other 17-series iPhone.
Notch is unchanged from the iPhone 14 era — no Dynamic Island, which means no Live Activities housing and a design that already feels years behind.

Vivo X300 Ultra

What Reviewers Agree On

The camera system — twin ~1-inch 200MP main and 200MP 85mm periscope plus a large ultrawide — is the best-equipped on any 2026 phone and the entire reason the device exists.
Video is class-leading: 4K 120fps 10-bit Log with Dolby Vision recorded on-device (no SSD), 8K30 across the rear cameras, and 4K 60fps on every lens including the selfie.
Battery life is genuinely strong — roughly 16 hours active-use score, ~7h heavy screen-on time, and 13–14 hour days with charge to spare, on the 6,600mAh cell.
The Zeiss 200mm/400mm telephoto extenders deliver real, usable optical reach (8.7x and 17.4x) with surprisingly good handheld stabilisation.
100W wired charging refills the big battery in roughly 46–50 minutes, with 40W wireless on top.
The 6.82-inch 144Hz LTPO AMOLED is among the best displays available, hitting ~1,900 nits in auto and ~3,300 nits peak.

Deal Breakers

The 35mm (~1.5x) default main focal length is polarising — many reviewers find it too tight/zoomed versus the usual 24mm.
It heats up quickly under sustained camera or gaming load and throttles to roughly 60–65% stability in prolonged stress tests.
The full experience needs the expensive Photography Kit — the global bundle approaches €2,600 and the 200mm lens isn't in every box.
Notebookcheck found it 'hardly better than the X300 Pro in camera performance despite top-notch hardware', and Linus preferred Oppo's less over-sharpened processing.
It launched in China first with a rocky early software state (fixed via updates), and global availability/pricing is limited and steep.

Cons

The 60Hz display in 2026 is the universally cited deal-breaker — every reviewer says cheap Android phones now ship with 120Hz and the regular iPhone 17 has ProMotion at $200 more.
Only one rear camera — no ultrawide — limits framing for group shots, landscapes, tight indoor scenes, and tasks where the Pixel 10a's second lens is genuinely useful.
The iPhone 17 is just $200 more and unlocks ProMotion, Dynamic Island, always-on display, an ultrawide, the new 24MP square selfie camera, and a slightly larger sensor — most reviewers say the $200 step-up is the one to take.
No Ultra Wideband (UWB) chip means precision-finding AirTags and other UWB accessories don't fully work — a strange omission on a current Apple phone.
Same 12MP selfie camera as the 16e — no Center Stage, no square sensor, no automatic landscape switching that's on every other 17-series iPhone.
Notch is unchanged from the iPhone 14 era — no Dynamic Island, which means no Live Activities housing and a design that already feels years behind.

Vivo X300 Ultra

Pros

The camera system — twin ~1-inch 200MP main and 200MP 85mm periscope plus a large ultrawide — is the best-equipped on any 2026 phone and the entire reason the device exists.
Video is class-leading: 4K 120fps 10-bit Log with Dolby Vision recorded on-device (no SSD), 8K30 across the rear cameras, and 4K 60fps on every lens including the selfie.
Battery life is genuinely strong — roughly 16 hours active-use score, ~7h heavy screen-on time, and 13–14 hour days with charge to spare, on the 6,600mAh cell.
The Zeiss 200mm/400mm telephoto extenders deliver real, usable optical reach (8.7x and 17.4x) with surprisingly good handheld stabilisation.
100W wired charging refills the big battery in roughly 46–50 minutes, with 40W wireless on top.
The 6.82-inch 144Hz LTPO AMOLED is among the best displays available, hitting ~1,900 nits in auto and ~3,300 nits peak.

Cons

The 35mm (~1.5x) default main focal length is polarising — many reviewers find it too tight/zoomed versus the usual 24mm.
It heats up quickly under sustained camera or gaming load and throttles to roughly 60–65% stability in prolonged stress tests.
The full experience needs the expensive Photography Kit — the global bundle approaches €2,600 and the 200mm lens isn't in every box.
Notebookcheck found it 'hardly better than the X300 Pro in camera performance despite top-notch hardware', and Linus preferred Oppo's less over-sharpened processing.
It launched in China first with a rocky early software state (fixed via updates), and global availability/pricing is limited and steep.

Vivo X300 Ultra

A 6.82-inch 144Hz LTPO AMOLED, now flat rather than quad-curved. Lab measurements put real brightness near 1,900 nits in auto and ~3,300 nits on a small window — among the best panels on any phone — and reviewers single out content consumption and clarity as standouts.

We measured a maximum of over 1,900 nits in auto-brightness mode and over 3,300 nits when lighting up a smaller portion of the screen.
Consuming content, scrolling the web, pixel-peeping and zooming in on text — it doesn't get any clearer, or with the 144Hz any smoother, than the display on the X300 Ultra.
It delivers an excellent max brightness of around 1,935 nits with a 75% white pattern and a peak of 3,328 nits with a 10% pattern.
Vivo has gone with a flat display this time, a clear shift from the quad-curved style of the X200 Ultra.
It's a 6.82-inch AMOLED with a claimed 4,500-nit HDR peak that can reach that figure in a one-person window watching HDR content; PWM sits around 3.5% at max brightness, better for flicker-sensitive users.
An absolutely stunning display with terrific, bass-heavy stereo speakers to match.

Battery & Charging

Apple iPhone 17e

Same 4,005 mAh battery as the 16e, but the more efficient A19 plus the C1X modem give the 17e comfortable all-day endurance — Trusted Reviews finished a typical day with 15-20% left, The Verge ended at ~50% after 3-4 hours of screen-on time, and Wired hit nearly two days on light use. The actually-new charging story is MagSafe + Qi2 at 15W (double the 16e's 7.5W), plus 0-50% wired in 28-30 minutes via a 20W+ adapter. No charger in the box — just a USB-C-to-USB-C braided cable.

No red flags on the battery front — with three to four hours of screen-on time, the 17e finishes the day around 50% remaining.
Battery life is reliable — even on heavy days of navigation, music streaming and video, the 17e lasts a full day with around 20% left before bedtime, and light use can stretch to two days.
MagSafe wireless charging at 15W is a huge real-world improvement over the 16e — in a 15-minute test on a wireless stand the 17e gained 16% versus just 3% for the 16e.
JerryRigEverything teardown actually measured 17W draw from a 15W MagSafe charger, suggesting Apple's headline number may be conservative.
Wired charging goes from 0-50% in 28 minutes with a 20W plug — fast enough for the price, even though no plug is included in the box.
The Pixel 10a's 5,100 mAh battery and 30W charging still pull ahead of the 17e's 4,005 mAh cell — the iPhone's efficiency narrows the gap but can't close it on capacity.
Same 4,005 mAh battery as the 16e, but Apple still rates it for up to 26 hours of video playback — efficiency from the A19 plus C1X keeps endurance roughly identical.
MagSafe also enables the entire Apple magnetic accessory ecosystem — power banks, wallets, tripods, car mounts — that the 16e couldn't tap into.

Vivo X300 Ultra

Vivo grew the silicon-carbon cell 10% to 6,600mAh while keeping the body the same size. Real-world endurance is strong — ~16h active-use score, ~7h heavy screen-on, 13–14 hour days with charge to spare — and 100W wired refills it in under an hour, with 40W wireless.

Vivo increased the battery by 10% to 6,600mAh despite the phone being practically the same size on paper.
In our battery test it earned an active-use score of almost 16 hours; 100W charging took it 0–66% in 30 minutes and a full charge in 46 minutes, plus 40W wireless. A charger is in the box except in Europe.
On the China version I'm finishing entire 13–14 hour days with 25–30% left; the global version keeps the 6,600mAh cell so battery life should comfortably last 12–13 hours of heavy use.
Getting nearly 7 hours of screen-on time with very heavy usage from the 6,600mAh silicon-carbon unit, with 100W wired and 40W wireless charging support.
After a 4-hour heavy-usage simulation the phone still had ~45% battery left, which is solid by today's standards, and 100W wired charging takes about 45 minutes to full.