Google Pixel 10 Pro XL vs Vivo X300 Ultra

Google Pixel 10 Pro XL

Same triple-camera system as the Pixel 10 Pro — 50MP main f/1.7 + 48MP ultrawide + 48MP 5x telephoto, with new AI Pro Zoom for cloud-enhanced shots beyond 30x. SuperSaf's comparison: 'the Pixel 10 Pro and Pro XL have exactly the same camera hardware.' Phone Arena tested it against a full-frame Canon. Pocket-lint's verdict on the platform: 'best Android smartphone you can buy.'

• Camera hardware identical to Pixel 10 Pro: '50 megapixel main with an f/1.68 aperture, a 48 megapixel ultrawide, and a 48 megap telephoto' per a Pro XL hands-on review.
• Android Authority verdict: 'Google Pixel 10 Pro XL review: The best Android phone gets even better.'
• Tested against a full-frame Canon per Phone Arena: 'Google's latest Pixel 10 Pro XL, in particular, brags about having the best smartphone camera... I tested the Pixel 10 Pro XL camera against a full-frame Canon.'
• AI Pro Zoom mechanics per SuperSaf: 'this new AI pro zoom which kicks in when you go beyond 30 times' — cloud-enhanced detail-fill for super-long zoom shots, exclusive to Pro tier.
• Night Sight remains class-leading per Stuff: 'In darker environments, Google's Night Sight still shines as one of the best low light modes on any smartphone.'
• vs iPhone 17 Pro Max main-camera comparison per Qs6ZO5Af3N8: 'in the main camera, the one goes to the Pixel for the better HDR, more natural details, and sharper high-res photos, while the iPhone is better in showing more details at the lower resolutions, but at the cost of an oversharpened look in most cases.'
• Video recording gap per LoCiv7RjQyg: 'The iPhone can shoot at up to 4K at 120 fps while the Pixel tops out at 4K 60 fps. For portrait video, the iPhone does 4K 30 fps, while the Pixel is stuck at only 1080p 24 fps.'
• 100x AI zoom reality check — 'I snapped a 100 time zoom image of a plane going overhead, it turned the vague shot into a weird bundle of sticks with an orange nose cone' — works as demo, not as practical photography.

Vivo X300 Ultra

The reason the X300 Ultra exists: a near-1-inch 200MP 35mm main (Sony Lytia 901), a 200MP 85mm periscope, and the best ultrawide sensor on the market, tuned with Zeiss. Reviewers near-universally rate it the best-equipped camera phone of 2026 — with two important caveats: the 35mm default is divisive, and on raw image quality it's only marginally ahead of the cheaper X300 Pro.

• At the center is a 200MP main that's nearly a 1-inch sensor (Sony Lytia 901), backed by a 200MP 85mm-equivalent periscope telephoto — the phone is focused on camera quality and, even more so, video.
• Featuring three extra-large image sensors, the X300 Ultra's uncompromising camera hardware earned a solid rating — but it's hardly better than the cheaper X300 Pro in actual camera performance despite the top-notch hardware.
• I'm not sure I've seen better results from even 1-inch sensors — it's so close to 1-inch and the 35mm focal length makes for more cinematic-looking shots; the 85mm periscope is the sweet spot for portraits.
• It still holds the record for the best portrait-mode photos on a smartphone, especially at 85mm and 135mm; the 14mm ultrawide is sharp edge to edge.

Google Pixel 10 Pro XL

Tensor G5 on TSMC 3nm, 16GB RAM, vapor chamber cooling (Pro XL only). Benchmarks 34% faster than Tensor G4 per GSMArena, but still 88% single-core / 67% multi-core / 55% GPU vs Galaxy S25 Edge. Vapor chamber helps sustain higher clocks longer than the smaller Pro, but doesn't close the gap to Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5.

• Tensor G5 + 16GB RAM + 3nm TSMC fab — 'In the multi-core Geekbench run, the new model scored 34% faster than the G4 on the 9 Pro XL, just as advertised' per GSMArena.
• Same competitor benchmark gap per Linus: 'getting around 88% of the single core performance, 67% of the multi-core performance, and just 55% of the GPU performance' vs Galaxy S25 Edge — Pro XL doesn't escape the Tensor ceiling.
• Vapor chamber exclusive to Pro XL: 'because of the tensor chip and of course the vapor chamber, which by the way is only on the Pixel 10 Pro XL, not the 10 Pro' — sustained-load advantage over the Pro.
• Notebookcheck stress test: 'the Pixel 10 Pro XL displayed significant thermal throttling, going down to 54% of its max CPU performance' — vapor chamber softens but doesn't eliminate Tensor G5's thermal ceiling.
• Genshin per GSMArena: 'a visually demanding title such as Genshin Impact cannot maintain 60fps on the Pixel 10 Pro XL at its maximum settings, and the phone would routinely drop into the 50s or even the 40s.'
• Real-world fluidity verdict per 3-month review: 'the Pixel UI is generally really fluid and the Tensor chip still holds up enough that day-to-day usage is wicked fast and smooth.'
• Video export benchmark vs Galaxy: 'The Galaxy is exporting the project 35% faster than the Pixel, allowing it to move on to the browser test as the Pixel is still chugging along' — sustained workload gap is real.

Vivo X300 Ultra

Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 plus Vivo's custom imaging silicon delivers flagship benchmark numbers and strong gaming, but the camera-heavy hardware runs hot — sustained stress tests show roughly 60–65% stability and the camera app warms it up fast.

• At the heart is Qualcomm's current flagship Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, supplemented by Vivo's custom VS1 and V3-Plus imaging chips.
• It boots in 16 seconds (vs 21s for the S26 Ultra and 19s for the iPhone 17 Pro Max) and posts an AnTuTu score over 3,800,000, stronger than Samsung.
• In a prolonged stress test it throttled CPU performance to about 60% of peak — in line with other high-powered flagships — and 3DMark stability landed around 63–66%.
• It gets a bit hot after 30–40 minutes of gaming, but with no throttling even past an hour and never uncomfortable to hold; boost mode at max graphics gives around 4 hours of Wuthering Waves on a full charge.
• Native 120fps gaming with smooth/very-high graphics in many titles, with temperature barely crossing 35°C and power draw around 4W in battle-royale modes.

Google Pixel 10 Pro XL

5,200 mAh battery (largest in family, +330 mAh from Pro), 45W wired, 25W Qi2.2 magnetic wireless. SuperSaf measures the 45W as the family's most meaningful upgrade. Real-world tests vary: 7h 30m in social-app drain (vs iPhone 17 Pro Max 7h 33m, S26 Ultra 7h 22m); 11h 4m in PUBG sustained drain (behind every flagship). Charging gets to 33% in 15 min and 63% in 30 min — meaningful upgrade over Pro's 30W.

• 5,200 mAh battery + 45W wired + 25W Qi2.2 magnetic wireless — 'The Pixel 10 Pro XL's battery has seen a small increase from last year, to 5200mAh – again, not the largest I've seen lately, but still more than you'll find in either the Galaxy S25 Ultra or iPhone 16 Pro Max.'
• 45W is the most-loved upgrade per 6-month review: 'it's that updated quicker 45 W charging, and it genuinely has been just the best upgrade on the phone. I just think it is the biggest upgrade on the Pixel 10 series this year.'
• Social-app drain test result: 'In second place is the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL with a finishing time of 7 hours, 30 minutes, and 30 seconds' — beats Galaxy S26 Ultra (7h 22m), trails iPhone 17 Pro Max by 3 minutes.
• PUBG sustained gaming drain: 'The Pixel 10 Pro XL went down at 11 hours 4 minute and that is disappointing cuz there's no improvement whatsoever' — behind OnePlus 13 (11h 54m), S25 Ultra (12h 3m), iPhone (12h 42m), Xiaomi (12h 50m).
• Wired charging real-world: 'Using the Pixel 10 Pro XL's 45 watt wire charging, we are able to fill the phone from empty to 33% and 63% full after 15 minutes and half an hour' — meaningful upgrade over the Pro's 23W real-world peak.
• Full-charge time slower than last year per Notebookcheck: 'the Pixel 10 Pro XL is slower than last year, charging from 0 to 59% in half an hour and taking an hour and 22 minutes to charge to full' — battery grew but charging speed regressed slightly.
• Notebookcheck endurance: '10 hours and 11 minutes... way behind the competition when it comes to battery life' — same lab-test-class deficit vs iPhone 17 Pro Max and Galaxy S25 Ultra.

Vivo X300 Ultra

Vivo grew the silicon-carbon cell 10% to 6,600mAh while keeping the body the same size. Real-world endurance is strong — ~16h active-use score, ~7h heavy screen-on, 13–14 hour days with charge to spare — and 100W wired refills it in under an hour, with 40W wireless.

• Vivo increased the battery by 10% to 6,600mAh despite the phone being practically the same size on paper.
• In our battery test it earned an active-use score of almost 16 hours; 100W charging took it 0–66% in 30 minutes and a full charge in 46 minutes, plus 40W wireless. A charger is in the box except in Europe.
• On the China version I'm finishing entire 13–14 hour days with 25–30% left; the global version keeps the 6,600mAh cell so battery life should comfortably last 12–13 hours of heavy use.
• Getting nearly 7 hours of screen-on time with very heavy usage from the 6,600mAh silicon-carbon unit, with 100W wired and 40W wireless charging support.
• After a 4-hour heavy-usage simulation the phone still had ~45% battery left, which is solid by today's standards, and 100W wired charging takes about 45 minutes to full.