Google Pixel 10 vs Vivo X300 Ultra

Google Pixel 10

The headline upgrade: a 10.8MP 5x telephoto lens — first time on a base Pixel. Paired with a 48MP main and 13MP ultrawide. The Pro models still win on main-sensor size and 48MP telephoto + ultrawide, but the base Pixel 10 closes most of the practical gap for everyday shooting. Computational photography still dominates the experience.

• 48MP main + 13MP ultrawide + 10.8MP 5x telephoto — Digital Trends: 'The new 5x telephoto lens marks the first of its kind for the base Pixel, and it means that an $800 Google phone ostensibly delivers the same great Pixel experience as the flagship Pixel 10 Pro series.'
• Main camera downgrade caveat — SuperSaf: 'the main camera on the Pixel 10 downgraded from 50 megapixels last year to 48' and 'the ultrawide cameras had a massive downgrade.'
• Computational photography still leads at this price — The Tech Chap: 'I feel like Google Pixel is one of the best, if not the best camera phone in terms of image quality.'
• Camera Coach is the new flagship AI feature: 'tap the camera coach button in the top corner and it'll think for a moment, analyze your frame, and then give you some suggestions for like some scenes and then also give you some guidance as to how to shoot those scenes' — Dave2D.
• Color/processing critique vs Samsung at 700% zoom: 'the fence has completely lost its detail in the Pixel 10, whereas you can see the diamond pattern of the fencing on the Pixel 9' — Pixel 10's processing softens distant detail more than its predecessor.
• Video gap to iPhone widens — SuperSaf: 'It's got good hardware, fantastic software experiences, pretty good internals, and the camera system that can delight with photos, even if video surely still needs work.'
• Video boost is locked to the Pro tier — base Pixel 10 misses the cloud-enhanced 4K/8K processing reserved for paid models, a 'limitation imposed by Google to differentiate its phones' (a 6-month long-term reviewer).

Vivo X300 Ultra

The reason the X300 Ultra exists: a near-1-inch 200MP 35mm main (Sony Lytia 901), a 200MP 85mm periscope, and the best ultrawide sensor on the market, tuned with Zeiss. Reviewers near-universally rate it the best-equipped camera phone of 2026 — with two important caveats: the 35mm default is divisive, and on raw image quality it's only marginally ahead of the cheaper X300 Pro.

• At the center is a 200MP main that's nearly a 1-inch sensor (Sony Lytia 901), backed by a 200MP 85mm-equivalent periscope telephoto — the phone is focused on camera quality and, even more so, video.
• Featuring three extra-large image sensors, the X300 Ultra's uncompromising camera hardware earned a solid rating — but it's hardly better than the cheaper X300 Pro in actual camera performance despite the top-notch hardware.
• I'm not sure I've seen better results from even 1-inch sensors — it's so close to 1-inch and the 35mm focal length makes for more cinematic-looking shots; the 85mm periscope is the sweet spot for portraits.
• It still holds the record for the best portrait-mode photos on a smartphone, especially at 85mm and 135mm; the 14mm ultrawide is sharp edge to edge.

Google Pixel 10

Tensor G5 — Google's first chip fabricated by TSMC on a 3nm node, designed for AI-first workloads. CPU is 30% faster than Pixel 9; GPU is *worse*. The chip is now the family's defining controversy: it benchmarks like a 2023 flagship against the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 and Apple A19 Pro, but real-world UI fluidity is fine for non-gaming workloads.

• Tensor G5 on TSMC 3nm with 12GB RAM (vs Samsung-fabricated G4 in the Pixel 9) — Linus Tech Tips: 'the Pixel 10 was able to increase its benchmarking speeds by 30% in single core performance and nearly 40% in multi-core performance.'
• GPU regression: 'in GPU performance, the Pixel 10 actually performs a little bit worse with it only achieving 93% of the score the Pixel 9 was able to get' — Linus Tech Tips.
• Flagship comparison gap: '87% of the single core performance, 65% of the multi-core performance, and only 55% of the GPU performance with the S25 Edge' — base Pixel 10 trailing the same-price Snapdragon flagship by wide margins.
• Sustained performance stress test: 'Pixel 10 hitting its peak performance with a 24% increase in score compared to the Pixel 9 series, but only a 5% increase in average performance overall' — thermal throttling kicks in fast.
• iPhone 17 head-to-head: 'the iPhone 17 is about a crazy 118% faster than the Pixel 10 in single core performance and about 107% faster in multi-core performance.'
• Daily usability verdict: 'Pixel UI is generally really fluid and the Tensor chip still holds up enough that day-to-day usage is wicked fast and smooth' — performance gap mostly invisible outside of gaming/benchmarks.

Vivo X300 Ultra

Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 plus Vivo's custom imaging silicon delivers flagship benchmark numbers and strong gaming, but the camera-heavy hardware runs hot — sustained stress tests show roughly 60–65% stability and the camera app warms it up fast.

• At the heart is Qualcomm's current flagship Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, supplemented by Vivo's custom VS1 and V3-Plus imaging chips.
• It boots in 16 seconds (vs 21s for the S26 Ultra and 19s for the iPhone 17 Pro Max) and posts an AnTuTu score over 3,800,000, stronger than Samsung.
• In a prolonged stress test it throttled CPU performance to about 60% of peak — in line with other high-powered flagships — and 3DMark stability landed around 63–66%.
• It gets a bit hot after 30–40 minutes of gaming, but with no throttling even past an hour and never uncomfortable to hold; boost mode at max graphics gives around 4 hours of Wuthering Waves on a full charge.
• Native 120fps gaming with smooth/very-high graphics in many titles, with temperature barely crossing 35°C and power draw around 4W in battle-royale modes.

Google Pixel 10

4,970 mAh (8% larger than Pixel 9), 30W wired charging (~55% in 30 min), 15W Pixelsnap Qi2 magnetic wireless. Real-world endurance lands at 15-16 hours of mixed use per the Pixel 10 hands-on testers, slightly *worse* than the Pixel 9 in lab tests according to Linus Tech Tips — Google traded battery efficiency for the larger Tensor G5 die area.

• 4,970 mAh battery (+270 mAh vs Pixel 9), 30W wired, 15W Qi2 wireless (Pixelsnap magnetic) — TechCrunch confirms full Qi2 spec on base Pixel 10.
• Real-world endurance per Pixel 10 user at a week of testing: 'Google claims 30 hours of use on a single charge, but I got more like 15 to 16 hours of use with mixed usage patterns every day for the week.'
• Lab regression vs Pixel 9: 'the Pixel 10 was able to get 17 and 12 hours of battery life, which sounds like plenty, but is actually an hour and a half less than last year's phone.'
• Charging speed: 'Using Google's 30W wired charger, you can expect to hit around 55% in half an hour, which is a noticeable step up from previous generations' (Stuff). Behind 80W+ Chinese flagships but matches iPhone.
• iPhone 17 efficiency lesson: 'even though the iPhone 17 packs a smaller 3,692 mAh battery compared to the Pixel 10's 4,970 mAh unit, it is clearly more power efficient.' Pixel 10 drained 88% vs iPhone 17's 83% across a 6-hour drain test.
• Battery health programmatically dialed back after 200 cycles — Google's policy throttles charge voltage starting at 200 cycles to maintain 80% capacity through 1,000 cycles, vs Samsung S25 Ultra's 2,000-cycle endurance to the same threshold.

Vivo X300 Ultra

Vivo grew the silicon-carbon cell 10% to 6,600mAh while keeping the body the same size. Real-world endurance is strong — ~16h active-use score, ~7h heavy screen-on, 13–14 hour days with charge to spare — and 100W wired refills it in under an hour, with 40W wireless.

• Vivo increased the battery by 10% to 6,600mAh despite the phone being practically the same size on paper.
• In our battery test it earned an active-use score of almost 16 hours; 100W charging took it 0–66% in 30 minutes and a full charge in 46 minutes, plus 40W wireless. A charger is in the box except in Europe.
• On the China version I'm finishing entire 13–14 hour days with 25–30% left; the global version keeps the 6,600mAh cell so battery life should comfortably last 12–13 hours of heavy use.
• Getting nearly 7 hours of screen-on time with very heavy usage from the 6,600mAh silicon-carbon unit, with 100W wired and 40W wireless charging support.
• After a 4-hour heavy-usage simulation the phone still had ~45% battery left, which is solid by today's standards, and 100W wired charging takes about 45 minutes to full.