Google Pixel 10a vs Poco F7 Ultra

Google Pixel 10a

The 6.3-inch 1080×2424 pOLED with 120Hz refresh is identical in resolution and panel tech to the 9a, but Google bumped peak brightness 11% to 3,000 nits and finally replaced the ancient Gorilla Glass 3 with Gorilla Glass 7i. Reviewers agree it is good rather than great — bright enough for outdoor use, sharp, fast — but the bezels remain noticeably thick by 2026 mid-range standards, and the panel still ships with 120Hz off by default.

• The Gorilla Glass 7i upgrade from the ancient Gorilla Glass 3 might secretly be the best improvement here, bringing the screen's protection and feel closer to the base Pixel 10.
• After two weeks of use I can't see a single scratch on the Pixel 10a's screen — the Gorilla Glass 7i upgrade noticeably improves on the older Gorilla Glass 3.
• The display is fast, responsive, vibrant, and the on-screen fingerprint sensor is in an easy-to-reach spot toward the middle of the phone.
• Display brightness climbs to 3,000 nits at peak, matching the iPhone 17 Pro — readability is excellent even on sunny days outdoors.
• Slimmer bezels than the 9a, but still pretty thick — only a 0.8% increase in screen-to-body ratio, and noticeably thicker than the OnePlus Nord 5 or Honor 400.
• The 11 percent boost to 3,000 nits matches the Pixel 10, but the difference won't be obvious unless you put a 9a and 10a side by side in strong sunlight.
• The display ships with refresh rate set to 60Hz out of the box — you have to manually flip it to 120Hz in settings, which most casual buyers never will.
• Coming from a 7a's 90Hz panel, the 10a's 120Hz feels noticeably smoother — and the measured peak brightness over 4,000 nits SDR is brighter than most content you'll ever watch.

Poco F7 Ultra

A 6.67-inch 2K 120Hz AMOLED that's bright, color-accurate and a clear generational upgrade.

• GSMArena measured 1,506 nits under standard test conditions — plenty bright and a clear improvement over the F6 Pro.
• A 2K 120Hz AMOLED with 3,200-nit peak brightness — r/Android calls it 'excellent, bright, Dolby Vision-compliant.'
• Independent testing logged ~3,200-nit peak and ~1,800 nits in high-brightness mode, with a 1.91-nit minimum and 3,840Hz PWM dimming for night use.
• In a side-by-side it was visibly brighter than a Samsung flagship in harsh outdoor light, despite costing half as much.

Google Pixel 10a

The 5,100 mAh cell is identical to the 9a's — Engadget measured 28 hours in their video rundown (matching last year), and most reviewers report comfortable all-day life with two-day endurance on lighter use. Charging is the bigger story: wired jumps from 23W to 30W (~50% in 30 minutes, full in ~98 minutes), and wireless from 7.5W to 10W. The non-negotiable disappointment is the lack of Pixelsnap magnets — every single reviewer flags it.

• The 10a ran 28 hours in Engadget's video rundown test — exactly where the Pixel 9a landed last year, putting it middle of the pack for 2026 flagships.
• After a heavy workday — off charger at 8am, messaging, snaps, scrolling, evening event — the 10a still had 26% left by midnight. Two-day life is achievable on lighter use.
• Battery life has been OK — the 10a lasts a full day with average use but still requires daily charging, and heavier travel use pushes me to top up in the afternoon.
• The 10a actually outperformed my personal Pixel 10 on raw battery life — and on lighter days I squeezed two full days of use out of a single charge.
• Wired charging hits 30W and delivers ~50% in 30 minutes as advertised, with a full charge in about 98 minutes — serviceable but not class-leading.
• No Pixelsnap magnets is the biggest letdown — Google should have brought Qi2 wireless charging to the A-series the way Apple brought MagSafe to the iPhone 17e.
• The lack of Pixelsnap is the biggest let down here by far — Google should have found a way to get it on the 10a, and a third-party magnetic case ruins one of the best aspects of this phone's design.
• There are no Pixelsnap magnets inside the 10a, which feels arbitrary — almost as if Google is gating the feature to make the $800 Pixel 10 look like a better upgrade.
• Adding Pixelsnap magnets across the entire Pixel 10 lineup would have been a clean win and a great moment for Google — instead the A-series gets left out yet again.
• Wireless charging up to 10W from 7.5W is a real bump — but without Pixelsnap, I can't imagine throwing this thing on a wireless charger very often.

Poco F7 Ultra

A modest 5,300mAh cell offset by the fastest charging in its class — 120W wired and Ultra-exclusive 50W wireless.

• 120W wired charging fully refills the 5,300mAh battery in ~30 minutes (60% at the 15-minute mark); a 90W adapter is only marginally slower.
• Adds 120W wired plus 50W wireless charging — faster than anything out there including the S25 Ultra, and wireless charging is exclusive to the Ultra in the F7 line.
• The F7 Pro carries a larger 6,000mAh battery vs the Ultra's 5,300mAh, but real-world battery-life difference between them is minor.
• Endurance results vary widely by test — one rundown hit an 'insane' 35h27m, while a standardized 1440p test got only ~14h22m, behind a smaller-battery S25 Ultra.
• In a six-flagship drain test it lasted 6h18m of active screen-on time — mid-pack, behind the iPhone, OnePlus and Vivo X200 Pro but ahead of the Xiaomi 15.

Google Pixel 10a

Holding the price at $499 in a year of RAM shortages and broad consumer-electronics inflation is itself a small win — Samsung's Galaxy S26 line all saw price increases this cycle. But the elephant in every review is the Pixel 9a still on Google's store at the same price, and on retailer sale for ~$100 less. The iPhone 17e's MagSafe + A19 upgrade, plus the Nothing Phone 4a Pro's telephoto + 50W charging at the same $499, give the 10a real same-price competition for the first time. Reviewers split: about half explicitly recommend the cheaper 9a; the other half argue the flush camera, Gorilla Glass 7i and Satellite SOS justify the new model for first-time A-series buyers.

• It's probably still the best $500 you can spend on an Android phone — but if you can pick up a Pixel 9a for even a few bucks cheaper, you should do that instead.
• The Nothing Phone 4a Pro at the same $499 poses tough competition with a bigger and brighter screen, a Qualcomm processor, a dedicated telephoto lens, and 50W charging — making the Pixel 10a a tougher sell.
• The Pixel 10a is still $500, the same price as the Pixel 7a from three years ago — against the backdrop of RAM-shortage inflation, flat pricing is more remarkable than it sounds.
• Apple's iPhone 17e is the same price as the iPhone 16e but adds MagSafe and a class-leading A19 chip while doubling base storage — making Google look lazy by comparison.
• For $499, the 10a is one of the best-balanced Android phones you can buy — Editors' Choice winner for the midrange category despite the unchanged processor.
• The Pixel 9a is still on sale for £100 less and has the same chip, specifications, camera, software, and practically the same design — making it a far better buy.
• I give the Pixel 10a a 9 out of 10 — still the best phone you can buy new for $500 and the one I'll continue to recommend to casual users or anyone switching to Android.
• TechRadar concludes the 10a delivers where it matters most — a comfortable design, strong battery life, a bright display and a dependable camera — and remains one of the best $499 Android options in its class.
• If you already have last year's Pixel 9a there is no reason to change — and the Nothing Phone 4a Pro at the same price packs better specs.
• If you have to get a Pixel, the Pixel 9a is the better buy with its lower price tag — or even the Pixel 9 for its better features. The 10a should have offered just a bit more to justify the launch price.
• The 10a is a 9a in 10a clothing — solid mid-range pick that keeps Google in the game for now, but definitely not worth the upgrade for current 9a users.
• On r/gadgets the top-voted comment captures user sentiment: 'Why haven't they reduced the price of the pixel 9a? They're both selling for $499 which makes no sense.'
• r/Android's top comment crystallizes the cynicism: 'After Apple announced 17e, 10a seems even more like an insult to the customers in hindsight. That phone improves so much from 16e.'

Poco F7 Ultra

Widely called the best bargain of 2025 — its toughest competition is its own cheaper sibling, the F7 Pro.

• Android Central's verdict: 'POCO F7 Ultra review: The best bargain of 2025.'
• Mark Ellis Reviews: with flagship Snapdragon 8 Elite performance, a vibrant display and staggeringly good battery life, it's 'a formidable phone in the mid-range market.'
• Creative Bloq asked whether it 'could be the best value camera phone of 2025' — a question POCO's cameras have never previously invited.
• The closest rival is its own sibling: the F7 Pro 'does basically the same things for less cash' with a bigger battery — the Ultra justifies itself on chipset, telephoto and wireless charging.
• Forbes notes the F7 Ultra was POCO's first true flagship phone with 'no-compromise cameras (for the price)' — a milestone for the brand.