Google Pixel 9 Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra

Google Pixel 9 Pro

A 50MP wide, 48MP ultrawide and a much-improved 48MP 5x telephoto plus a 42MP selfie — the system reviewers say cements the Pixel as the best camera phone.

• With a refined design, much-improved telephoto camera and great battery life, the Pixel 9 Pro cements its status as the smartphone with the best camera.
• The Pixel 9 Pro has arguably the best camera among the big three flagships, plus Google software like Night Sight and Magic Eraser.
• Camera spec: 50MP wide, 48MP ultrawide, 48MP telephoto and a 42MP front camera.
• In an iPhone 16 Pro Max vs Pixel 9 Pro XL shootout the iPhone won — its images were brighter and preserved highlights better.
• Reviewers were unusually critical of camera and especially video quality for a Pixel, and the camera hardware wasn't noticeably updated.

Vivo X300 Ultra

The reason the X300 Ultra exists: a near-1-inch 200MP 35mm main (Sony Lytia 901), a 200MP 85mm periscope, and the best ultrawide sensor on the market, tuned with Zeiss. Reviewers near-universally rate it the best-equipped camera phone of 2026 — with two important caveats: the 35mm default is divisive, and on raw image quality it's only marginally ahead of the cheaper X300 Pro.

• At the center is a 200MP main that's nearly a 1-inch sensor (Sony Lytia 901), backed by a 200MP 85mm-equivalent periscope telephoto — the phone is focused on camera quality and, even more so, video.
• Featuring three extra-large image sensors, the X300 Ultra's uncompromising camera hardware earned a solid rating — but it's hardly better than the cheaper X300 Pro in actual camera performance despite the top-notch hardware.
• I'm not sure I've seen better results from even 1-inch sensors — it's so close to 1-inch and the 35mm focal length makes for more cinematic-looking shots; the 85mm periscope is the sweet spot for portraits.
• It still holds the record for the best portrait-mode photos on a smartphone, especially at 85mm and 135mm; the 14mm ultrawide is sharp edge to edge.
• Comparing it directly with the Oppo Find X9 Ultra, even though the Vivo looks great at a glance you could edit the Oppo image and get better detail because the Vivo isn't all over-sharpened and crusty.

Google Pixel 9 Pro

A compact ~4,700mAh battery that reviews praised as 'great' but heavy users find can't last a day — the Pixel 9 Pro's most polarising trait.

• Engadget rated the Pixel 9 Pro's battery life as 'great,' a key part of why it recommends the phone.
• Google advertises it as a 24-hour battery on the 6.3-inch Super Actua model.
• For light/moderate use the battery is 'fantastic,' but heavy users call it the worst they've owned — it can't make it through an entire day.
• One owner got about 3h11m screen-on-time from 37% battery in mixed use — modest for heavy days.
• New 45W-class wired charging plus wireless and Battery Share carry over from the Pro line.

Vivo X300 Ultra

Vivo grew the silicon-carbon cell 10% to 6,600mAh while keeping the body the same size. Real-world endurance is strong — ~16h active-use score, ~7h heavy screen-on, 13–14 hour days with charge to spare — and 100W wired refills it in under an hour, with 40W wireless.

• Vivo increased the battery by 10% to 6,600mAh despite the phone being practically the same size on paper.
• In our battery test it earned an active-use score of almost 16 hours; 100W charging took it 0–66% in 30 minutes and a full charge in 46 minutes, plus 40W wireless. A charger is in the box except in Europe.
• On the China version I'm finishing entire 13–14 hour days with 25–30% left; the global version keeps the 6,600mAh cell so battery life should comfortably last 12–13 hours of heavy use.
• Getting nearly 7 hours of screen-on time with very heavy usage from the 6,600mAh silicon-carbon unit, with 100W wired and 40W wireless charging support.
• After a 4-hour heavy-usage simulation the phone still had ~45% battery left, which is solid by today's standards, and 100W wired charging takes about 45 minutes to full.
• In a head-to-head charge race against the Oppo Find X9 Ultra (80W), the Vivo on 100W finished first at 50 minutes 20 seconds to the Oppo's 52:39.

Google Pixel 9 Pro

At $999 it's one of the best phones of its year, and frequent deep discounts ($849–$949, £699) make it an exceptional value.

• The Pixel 9 Pro is one of the best smartphones released this year — the phone the reviewer always wanted.
• At £699 the Pixel 9 Pro is the best phone deal of 2025 so far — one of the best phones you can buy, now also one of the most affordable.
• It undercuts the iPhone 15 Pro Max ($1,199) and Galaxy S25 Ultra ($1,300) while arguably having the best camera of the three.
• Google's latest Pro is one of the most all-round excellent phones ever made.
• A vocal camp considers the 9 Pro the worst phone they've owned in years, ~90% because of the Tensor chip.
• The whole Pixel 9 line is frequently discounted (e.g., Pixel 9 Pro to $849, plus a $400-off Amazon deal), making it strong value.

Vivo X300 Ultra

This is a deliberately niche, camera-first flagship: roughly €1,175 in China for 512GB, around £1,399 globally for the phone, and close to €2,600 for the full kit. For the people it's aimed at it draws some of the strongest praise of any 2026 phone; for everyone else, a cheaper X300 Pro or the Oppo Find X9 Ultra may make more sense.

• Last year's X200 Ultra was, in my opinion, one of the best smartphones of 2025 — and this is the best smartphone I've ever used, with the best camera application I've ever used, provided with zero script from Vivo.
• The cameras are nothing short of amazing — this is the best Android camera phone, with image quality better than anything from Samsung.
• The versatility here is just ridiculous — more like a phone in a camera than the other way around, a camera system built from the sum of its many parts.
• If you accept the 35mm main, are willing to tolerate AI processing in some scenes, and don't mind the front-camera stabilisation limits, this Vivo is an excellent choice.