Motorola Edge 2025 vs Vivo X300 Ultra

Motorola Edge 2025

Motorola's most capable camera array — a triple system with a genuinely rare 3x telephoto for the price. Stills are strong for the tier, though video has a recurring bug.

• It packs a 50MP f/1.8 main (1/1.56", OIS), a 10MP 3x telephoto (73mm, OIS) and a 50MP 122° ultrawide — Motorola's most capable camera array.
• A dedicated 3x telephoto at this price is genuinely unusual, and the camera system is a clear upgrade over the Edge 2024.
• By no means flagship-level, but for a phone priced more like a budget device the camera results are genuinely satisfying.
• The ultrawide holds detail and colour unusually well — it doesn't show the quality drop-off typical of cheaper mid-rangers.
• Multiple testers hit a notable video-quality problem that appears to need a software patch.
• Across Motorola's lineup the cameras are still considered a relative weak point versus Samsung, Apple and Google.

Vivo X300 Ultra

The reason the X300 Ultra exists: a near-1-inch 200MP 35mm main (Sony Lytia 901), a 200MP 85mm periscope, and the best ultrawide sensor on the market, tuned with Zeiss. Reviewers near-universally rate it the best-equipped camera phone of 2026 — with two important caveats: the 35mm default is divisive, and on raw image quality it's only marginally ahead of the cheaper X300 Pro.

• At the center is a 200MP main that's nearly a 1-inch sensor (Sony Lytia 901), backed by a 200MP 85mm-equivalent periscope telephoto — the phone is focused on camera quality and, even more so, video.
• Featuring three extra-large image sensors, the X300 Ultra's uncompromising camera hardware earned a solid rating — but it's hardly better than the cheaper X300 Pro in actual camera performance despite the top-notch hardware.
• I'm not sure I've seen better results from even 1-inch sensors — it's so close to 1-inch and the 35mm focal length makes for more cinematic-looking shots; the 85mm periscope is the sweet spot for portraits.
• It still holds the record for the best portrait-mode photos on a smartphone, especially at 85mm and 135mm; the 14mm ultrawide is sharp edge to edge.

Motorola Edge 2025

The MediaTek Dimensity 7400 (Ultra) is fluid for everyday use and games acceptably without overheating, but it's the phone's clearest weakness — benchmarks sit in budget territory.

• The MediaTek Dimensity 7400 with 8GB RAM is fluid for everyday use — browsing, maps, email, streaming — but not blazing fast.
• Geekbench scores land it in the budget-to-upper-budget range — fine for the price, but performance is not top-notch.
• It played video games for an extended time without heating up once — unusual praise — holding ~60–90fps in lighter titles.
• After 35 minutes of mixed gaming the device stayed at normal temperature with impressive battery retention.
• 8GB RAM is the bare minimum, but the software RAM-boost to 16GB makes a noticeable difference and is recommended.
• Head-to-head against the Pixel 9a, OnePlus 13R and Nothing Phone (3a) Pro, the Edge 2025 can't keep up — and isn't really meant to.

Vivo X300 Ultra

Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 plus Vivo's custom imaging silicon delivers flagship benchmark numbers and strong gaming, but the camera-heavy hardware runs hot — sustained stress tests show roughly 60–65% stability and the camera app warms it up fast.

• At the heart is Qualcomm's current flagship Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, supplemented by Vivo's custom VS1 and V3-Plus imaging chips.
• It boots in 16 seconds (vs 21s for the S26 Ultra and 19s for the iPhone 17 Pro Max) and posts an AnTuTu score over 3,800,000, stronger than Samsung.
• In a prolonged stress test it throttled CPU performance to about 60% of peak — in line with other high-powered flagships — and 3DMark stability landed around 63–66%.
• It gets a bit hot after 30–40 minutes of gaming, but with no throttling even past an hour and never uncomfortable to hold; boost mode at max graphics gives around 4 hours of Wuthering Waves on a full charge.
• Native 120fps gaming with smooth/very-high graphics in many titles, with temperature barely crossing 35°C and power draw around 4W in battle-royale modes.

Motorola Edge 2025

A genuine strength: the 5,200mAh cell delivers a day and a half to two days of use, paired with fast 68W wired and 15W wireless charging — though no brick is included.

• Thanks to the 5,200mAh battery and efficient Dimensity 7400 Ultra chip, reviewers routinely got a day and a half to nearly two days of use.
• Two days of battery life on mixed use with no problem whatsoever.
• Lab testing measured ~6h45m of screen time — above the Galaxy A36 and iPhone 16e, but below the Pixel 9a's 8+ hours.
• 68W charging gets ~70% back in 30 minutes and a full charge in roughly 53 minutes (one test logged 59 minutes).
• It also supports 15W wireless charging — and works with a MagSafe case and charger.
• No charger in the box — you must buy Motorola's proprietary brick separately to reach full 68W speed.

Vivo X300 Ultra

Vivo grew the silicon-carbon cell 10% to 6,600mAh while keeping the body the same size. Real-world endurance is strong — ~16h active-use score, ~7h heavy screen-on, 13–14 hour days with charge to spare — and 100W wired refills it in under an hour, with 40W wireless.

• Vivo increased the battery by 10% to 6,600mAh despite the phone being practically the same size on paper.
• In our battery test it earned an active-use score of almost 16 hours; 100W charging took it 0–66% in 30 minutes and a full charge in 46 minutes, plus 40W wireless. A charger is in the box except in Europe.
• On the China version I'm finishing entire 13–14 hour days with 25–30% left; the global version keeps the 6,600mAh cell so battery life should comfortably last 12–13 hours of heavy use.
• Getting nearly 7 hours of screen-on time with very heavy usage from the 6,600mAh silicon-carbon unit, with 100W wired and 40W wireless charging support.
• After a 4-hour heavy-usage simulation the phone still had ~45% battery left, which is solid by today's standards, and 100W wired charging takes about 45 minutes to full.