Motorola Razr+ 2023 vs Nothing Phone (4a) | TechTalkTown
Motorola Razr+ 2023 vs Nothing Phone (4a)
Motorola Razr+ 2023
Motorola
8
Best clamshell foldable cover screen of 2023
Nothing Phone (4a)
Nothing
8.3
The mid-ranger that stands out
Motorola Razr+ 2023
What Reviewers Agree On
Best clamshell cover screen of 2023 — 3.6-inch 144Hz AMOLED runs full apps, beat Samsung's Z Flip 5 3.4-inch screen to market and on functionality.
Teardrop hinge with no visible gap when folded + minimal crease — meaningfully better than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5's hinge per multiple reviewers.
165Hz inner LTPO AMOLED + 144Hz outer panel — fastest refresh rates on any 2023 foldable, smooth for gaming + scrolling.
Aggressive 50%-off Black Friday + carrier discounts dropped the $999 launch price to $399-549 — making it the best clamshell value of 2023.
Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 + 8GB RAM delivers solid 2022-flagship performance — no real-world slowdown for typical use.
Deal Breakers
Pros & Cons
Motorola Razr+ 2023
Pros
Best clamshell cover screen of 2023 — 3.6-inch 144Hz AMOLED runs full apps, beat Samsung's Z Flip 5 3.4-inch screen to market and on functionality.
Teardrop hinge with no visible gap when folded + minimal crease — meaningfully better than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5's hinge per multiple reviewers.
165Hz inner LTPO AMOLED + 144Hz outer panel — fastest refresh rates on any 2023 foldable, smooth for gaming + scrolling.
Aggressive 50%-off Black Friday + carrier discounts dropped the $999 launch price to $399-549 — making it the best clamshell value of 2023.
Detailed Comparison
Display
Motorola Razr+ 2023
The 6.9-inch 165Hz LTPO inner panel and 144Hz cover screen are the fastest of any 2023 foldable — both AMOLED, both bright, both class-leading for the form factor.
6.9-inch foldable LTPO AMOLED, 165Hz, HDR10+, 1,400-nit peak — the fastest inner foldable display of 2023.
3.6-inch external AMOLED, 144Hz, 1,100-nit peak, HDR10+ + Gorilla Glass Victus — bright enough outdoors per real-world owners.
Wired: '165Hz refresh rate makes interacting with the cover display feel responsive' — first to ship this refresh rate on a phone in 2023.
Phandroid: 'one of the best smartphone displays for mobile gaming' thanks to 165Hz refresh + AMOLED color.
Nothing Phone (4a)
A genuine highlight for the price — a big 6.78-inch 120Hz AMOLED that's bright, sharp and HDR-capable, beating similarly priced rivals.
TechTalkTown may earn a commission from purchases made through links below. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. This does not influence our reviews. Learn more.
3,800mAh battery is small — Android Central forum users + reviewers consistently flag battery as the Razr+'s weakest point.
Only IP52 splash resistance (no dust or full water protection) — Galaxy Z Flip 5's IPX8 is meaningfully better protected.
Cameras lack a telephoto and Wired notes they 'don't measure up to the competition' — 12MP main + 13MP ultrawide both trail Galaxy Z Flip 5 in low-light + zoom.
Nothing Phone (4a)
What Reviewers Agree On
Distinctive Glyph design that stands out in a sea of black slabs — widely called one of the best-looking phones at its price
Excellent big screen for the money: a 6.78-inch 120Hz AMOLED, HDR10+, ~1,600 nits outdoor and a 4,500-nit HDR peak
Near-stock Nothing OS ranked among the best Android experiences, highly customisable and clean
A rare 3.5x (80mm) periscope telephoto at this price, adding real flexibility most budget rivals lack
A clear, substantial upgrade over the Phone 3a / Phone 3, fixing earlier design problems
Strong value — cheaper than the $500 Pixel 10a while feeling more premium than the price suggests
Deal Breakers
The 3.5x telephoto is poorly optimised — among the worst processing JerryRigEverything has seen on a periscope lens
The 8MP ultrawide is a basic, low-resolution sensor
Battery life is divisive — several owners report only 4–6.5 hours of screen-on time despite a ~5,080mAh cell
The Glyph Matrix's real-world usefulness is questioned by multiple reviewers
Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 + 8GB RAM delivers solid 2022-flagship performance — no real-world slowdown for typical use.
Cons
3,800mAh battery is small — Android Central forum users + reviewers consistently flag battery as the Razr+'s weakest point.
Only IP52 splash resistance (no dust or full water protection) — Galaxy Z Flip 5's IPX8 is meaningfully better protected.
Cameras lack a telephoto and Wired notes they 'don't measure up to the competition' — 12MP main + 13MP ultrawide both trail Galaxy Z Flip 5 in low-light + zoom.
Nothing Phone (4a)
Pros
Distinctive Glyph design that stands out in a sea of black slabs — widely called one of the best-looking phones at its price
Excellent big screen for the money: a 6.78-inch 120Hz AMOLED, HDR10+, ~1,600 nits outdoor and a 4,500-nit HDR peak
Near-stock Nothing OS ranked among the best Android experiences, highly customisable and clean
A rare 3.5x (80mm) periscope telephoto at this price, adding real flexibility most budget rivals lack
A clear, substantial upgrade over the Phone 3a / Phone 3, fixing earlier design problems
Strong value — cheaper than the $500 Pixel 10a while feeling more premium than the price suggests
Cons
The 3.5x telephoto is poorly optimised — among the worst processing JerryRigEverything has seen on a periscope lens
The 8MP ultrawide is a basic, low-resolution sensor
Battery life is divisive — several owners report only 4–6.5 hours of screen-on time despite a ~5,080mAh cell
The Glyph Matrix's real-world usefulness is questioned by multiple reviewers
The 6.78-inch display is 23% brighter than the 3a, reaching 1,600 nits outdoors with a 4,500-nit HDR peak.
Brightness goes up to 4,500 nits peak, remaining easily readable outdoors — the display is very strong for this price range and one of the standout features.
In the real world it hits around 700 nits peak SDR and ~1,550–1,600 nits in HDR, with 460ppi and dynamic 120Hz.
Cameras
Motorola Razr+ 2023
12MP main + 13MP ultrawide + 32MP selfie — the Razr+ 2023's biggest hardware weakness vs the Galaxy Z Flip 5. Wired notes the cameras 'don't measure up to the competition,' but the cover-screen viewfinder for selfies is a unique strength.
12MP main (with OIS) + 13MP ultrawide (108-degree FOV) + 32MP inner selfie — no telephoto camera.
Wired: 'this comparison is a good example of how Motorola's cameras don't measure up to the competition' — Z Flip 5 wins side-by-side.
Cover-screen selfie viewfinder lets subjects see themselves while you photograph them — unique feature mainstream phones can't match.
12MP main 'works decently well even in low-light' per Phandroid — adequate but not flagship-class daylight quality.
Ultrawide 108-degree FOV is narrower than Galaxy Z Flip 5's 124-degree ultrawide — meaningful difference for landscape + group shots.
Nothing Phone (4a)
A standout 3.5x periscope telephoto at this price and a solid main camera, undercut by an under-optimised zoom and a basic ultrawide.
A triple setup — 50MP main, a 50MP periscope telephoto and an 8MP ultrawide — undoubtedly one of the best experiences at this level.
The telephoto has been tweaked to a much better 3.5x (80mm) zoom factor.
A telephoto with optical zoom at this price is great, but this is the worst optimisation I've seen on a 3.5x camera — expect disappointment if you buy for the zoom.
The 3.5x optical-zoom telephoto is one of the biggest highlights, adding much more flexibility than most competitors in this price range, and the cameras are surprisingly capable.
Each camera here feels better than what you'd get on Samsung at the price, and the main is solid with nice detail.
Performance
Motorola Razr+ 2023
Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 + 8GB RAM is last-year flagship silicon — the cost-vs-spec trade-off Motorola chose to ship at $999 vs $1,200+ for an SD 8 Gen 2 device. Real-world performance is excellent for typical use.
Phandroid: 'you're not getting the latest and greatest chipset here since Motorola wanted to price the phone right at $999' — explicit cost trade-off.
Ars Technica: 'not the best you can get from Qualcomm' — the 8 Gen 2 would have been the right chip for a $999 launch.
Nothing Phone (4a)
A capable mid-range chip that handles everyday use and casual gaming well — not a powerhouse, but appropriate for the price.
Gaming is absolutely possible on this device, with solid everyday performance for the class.
There's no shortage of substantial hardware upgrades over the 3a, even if the design doesn't stand out as much as the Pro.
After 24 hours the home screen is extremely customisable and feels massively more functional than iOS, with no responsiveness complaints.
Gesture-based navigation is fully supported and the overall experience is good thanks to Nothing's optimisations.
Battery & Charging
Motorola Razr+ 2023
3,800mAh battery + 30W wired + 5W wireless — Phandroid measured full charge in ~1h 20min. Real-world endurance is the Razr+ 2023's weakest area; Android Central owners consistently flag battery as the biggest pain point.
3,800mAh dual-cell battery — small for the screen size, Android Central owners: 'the worst thing about this is battery.'
30W wired charging full in ~1h 20min per Phandroid — slow vs Galaxy Z Flip 5's 25W (1h 24min) is similar speed but smaller cell helps Motorola.
5W wireless charging only — Stuff notes the Razr+ wired beats Z Flip 5's 25W but loses on wireless (Samsung does 15W).
YouTuber long-term test (Razr 40 Ultra): 'all-day battery achievable for moderate use' with 165Hz refresh + LTPO panel efficiency.
No charger in the box — Razr+ owners must source their own 30W+ USB-C PD brick.
Nothing Phone (4a)
A ~5,080mAh cell with 50W wired charging — reviewers call endurance strong, but a notable group of owners report disappointing screen-on time.
The Nothing Phone (4a) features a ~5,080mAh cell which delivers very strong endurance in everyday use.
The battery grew slightly — about 80mAh in most markets but a more meaningful 400mAh in India — with a 50W PD unit recommended on the box.
Several owners report only 4–6.5 hours of screen-on time with moderate use — worse than other phones with similar ~5,000mAh batteries.
Battery life on this phone is excellent in everyday use.
