Nothing Phone (4a) Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S23 | TechTalkTown
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S23
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro
Nothing
8.5
The $499 phone to beat
Samsung Galaxy S23
Samsung
8
Best compact Android flagship of 2023
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro
What Reviewers Agree On
The new metal unibody makes the 4a Pro look and feel more premium than Nothing's own £799 Phone 3 — the slimmest, most 'pro'-feeling Nothing yet.
The 6.83-inch 1.5K 144Hz AMOLED is the best display Nothing has ever shipped, with strong real-world outdoor visibility around its realistic 1,600-nit figure.
The dual 50MP main plus 50MP 3.5x periscope-telephoto system is rare flagship-tier camera hardware at $499 and the single biggest reason to buy.
Nothing OS 4.1 on Android 16 is clean, bloat-free and has some of the best design consistency of any Android UI, Google included.
At $499 — the exact price of a Pixel 10a — it's outstanding value, with several reviewers preferring it outright to the 10a.
Pros & Cons
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro
Pros
The new metal unibody makes the 4a Pro look and feel more premium than Nothing's own £799 Phone 3 — the slimmest, most 'pro'-feeling Nothing yet.
The 6.83-inch 1.5K 144Hz AMOLED is the best display Nothing has ever shipped, with strong real-world outdoor visibility around its realistic 1,600-nit figure.
The dual 50MP main plus 50MP 3.5x periscope-telephoto system is rare flagship-tier camera hardware at $499 and the single biggest reason to buy.
Nothing OS 4.1 on Android 16 is clean, bloat-free and has some of the best design consistency of any Android UI, Google included.
Detailed Comparison
Cameras
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro
The headline value play: a 50MP Sony LYT-710 main with OIS, a true 50MP 3.5x periscope telephoto (80mm) with OIS, and an 8MP ultrawide — flagship-tier hardware Samsung and Apple don't put in phones at this price. Output is characterful and the telephoto is a genuine win, but reviewers consistently flag inconsistency, average low-light and a gimmicky 140x digital zoom.
Triple rear system: 50MP Sony LYT-710 main (f/1.9, OIS), 8MP ultrawide, and a 50MP periscope telephoto with 3.5x optical zoom (80mm, f/2.9, OIS).
Both the main and periscope-zoom cameras are 50MP and deliver strong results for this price range; the zoom in particular stands out from competitors and even allows for extreme digital zoom.
Having a proper dedicated telephoto shooter is a genuine love, although the camera experience itself is a little bit inconsistent at times.
TechTalkTown may earn a commission from purchases made through links below. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. This does not influence our reviews. Learn more.
50W wired charging beats anything Google, Apple or Samsung offer below £500.
Deal Breakers
Only 3 years of OS updates (6 years of security patches) — well behind the 7 years Google and Samsung give at this price.
No wireless charging at all — sacrificed for the metal back.
The battery is only an 80mAh increase over last year and runs marginal next to 6,000–7,000mAh budget rivals.
Measured brightness (~700 nits SDR, ~1,550 HDR) is nowhere near the 5,000-nit headline.
The camera is inconsistent — low-light and deep zoom are merely average rather than class-leading.
Samsung Galaxy S23
What Reviewers Agree On
Genuinely compact flagship — 6.1" body 'frees you from awkward big phones and camera spec overkill' (Android Central)
Same Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy chip as the Plus and Ultra — no performance compromise vs the more expensive siblings
Same 50MP main + 12MP ultrawide + 10MP 3x telephoto + 12MP selfie as the Plus — the 3x optical zoom is a real step up from rivals stuck at 2x
Display brightness up 35% from the S22 to 1750-nit peak; 120Hz Dynamic AMOLED 2X stays sharp and vibrant
Adopts the Ultra's floating-camera design — cohesive trio look without the contour bump
4 OS upgrades + 5 years of security — covers it through Android 17 and into 2027/2028
Deal Breakers
Only 25W wired charging — the Plus and Ultra get 45W, OnePlus 11 gets 80W; 0-100% takes ~1h12m even on the right charger
Just 3,900mAh battery — adequate at launch but flagged as the family's weak point, made worse by One UI 6/7 updates that increased drain noticeably
Ars Technica caught a 60GB Samsung system partition out of the box — 4x the size of a Pixel 7 Pro's, only one OS copy means ~30 min downtime per update
No S Pen, no UWB, no periscope telephoto — Samsung's flagship-tier extras stay on the Ultra
Engadget's verdict: 'A solid phone that's probably not worth the upgrade' over a recent S22/S21
At $499 — the exact price of a Pixel 10a — it's outstanding value, with several reviewers preferring it outright to the 10a.
50W wired charging beats anything Google, Apple or Samsung offer below £500.
Cons
Only 3 years of OS updates (6 years of security patches) — well behind the 7 years Google and Samsung give at this price.
No wireless charging at all — sacrificed for the metal back.
The battery is only an 80mAh increase over last year and runs marginal next to 6,000–7,000mAh budget rivals.
Measured brightness (~700 nits SDR, ~1,550 HDR) is nowhere near the 5,000-nit headline.
The camera is inconsistent — low-light and deep zoom are merely average rather than class-leading.
Samsung Galaxy S23
Pros
Genuinely compact flagship — 6.1" body 'frees you from awkward big phones and camera spec overkill' (Android Central)
Same Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy chip as the Plus and Ultra — no performance compromise vs the more expensive siblings
Same 50MP main + 12MP ultrawide + 10MP 3x telephoto + 12MP selfie as the Plus — the 3x optical zoom is a real step up from rivals stuck at 2x
Display brightness up 35% from the S22 to 1750-nit peak; 120Hz Dynamic AMOLED 2X stays sharp and vibrant
Adopts the Ultra's floating-camera design — cohesive trio look without the contour bump
4 OS upgrades + 5 years of security — covers it through Android 17 and into 2027/2028
Cons
Only 25W wired charging — the Plus and Ultra get 45W, OnePlus 11 gets 80W; 0-100% takes ~1h12m even on the right charger
Just 3,900mAh battery — adequate at launch but flagged as the family's weak point, made worse by One UI 6/7 updates that increased drain noticeably
Ars Technica caught a 60GB Samsung system partition out of the box — 4x the size of a Pixel 7 Pro's, only one OS copy means ~30 min downtime per update
No S Pen, no UWB, no periscope telephoto — Samsung's flagship-tier extras stay on the Ultra
Engadget's verdict: 'A solid phone that's probably not worth the upgrade' over a recent S22/S21
It's not clinically the best camera, but the shots have a bit more soul to them.
Low-light performance isn't the best, and image quality when you zoom right in isn't the best out there — not bad, just not class-leading.
The 140x zoom headline grabs attention, but in use it's more about how far the camera can push digitally than something you'd rely on day-to-day.
Not super impressed by the camera or the giant protruding bumps the lenses sit in.
Samsung Galaxy S23
Same 50MP main + 12MP ultrawide + 10MP 3x telephoto trio as the Plus — versatile and consistent in daylight. The 3x optical zoom is the standout vs rivals stuck at 2x.
Cameras: 50MP main (f/1.8, OIS), 12MP ultrawide (f/2.2, 120°), 10MP 3x telephoto, 12MP selfie — all 4K60 capable.
8K30 video added (up from 8K24 on S22), front camera 4K60 — content-creator-friendly upgrades.
Long-term owner: portrait video at 4K30 on both front and back, can switch lenses while recording 4K30 (not 4K60).
Camera less consistent vs Pixel 7a after June update — HDR and portrait have become more variable for some users.
Slot for camera spec creep — no 200MP and no 10x periscope here (those stay on the Ultra); 3x optical + 30x digital is the limit.
Performance
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro
The Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 with UFS 3.1 storage is a clear, tangible step up from the Phone (3a) generation — Nothing claims +27% CPU, +30% GPU and +65% AI. It's a perfectly capable everyday chip that feels noticeably quicker, but it's explicitly not a gaming powerhouse and warms up under sustained heavy load.
Backed by OS optimisations and a custom CPU scheduler, the chipset delivers 27% better CPU, 30% better GPU and 65% better AI performance than the Nothing Phone (3a); storage is 147% faster in reads and 380% faster in writes.
Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 is a perfectly acceptable chip across the board, and the upgrade to UFS 3.1 makes this feel noticeably quicker compared to the Nothing Phone (3a) and prior.
The CPU performance difference between the 4a Pro and the vanilla 4a is not massive, but it is still very much notable.
Available in 8GB+128GB, 8GB+256GB and 12GB+256GB configurations, all running near-stock AOSP-style Nothing OS.
Like most phones in this segment, it shows some basic heat build-up during really extensive tasks like gaming or 4K editing in high-end software, though it stays responsive while gaming.
It's by no means a top-notch gaming phone, although the processor is better than the regular 4a's and squeezes out a bit more performance and FPS.
Samsung Galaxy S23
Same bespoke Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy (3.36GHz) chip as the Plus and Ultra — no compromise. 40% faster than the S22 Ultra and meaningfully cooler. 8GB RAM keeps multitasking smooth even 3 years on.
Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy at 3.36GHz with 8GB RAM and 128GB UFS 3.1 base — same chip as the Plus and Ultra, no Exynos split.
Bespoke 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy is up to 40% faster than the S22 Ultra and adds Ray Tracing support for certain games.
Cool under normal use — even at 38-39°C ambient temps, no overheating issues; long-term performance holds up.
Three years in (2026): app opening, multitasking and Call of Duty still smooth — chip plus 8GB RAM has aged well.
Ars Technica caught a 60GB Samsung Android system partition out of the box — 4x the size of a Pixel 7 Pro's 15GB, and only one OS copy means ~30 min downtime during updates.
Battery & Charging
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro
The ~5,080mAh cell reliably gets through a day and endurance improved across all of GSMArena's tests versus the 3a Pro — but it's only an 80mAh bump over last year and looks small next to 6,000–7,000mAh budget rivals. 50W wired charging is the trade-off win; there is no wireless charging at all.
Endurance has improved across the board in all tests compared to last year's Nothing Phone (3a) Pro; with a 68W USB-PD charger the phone peaked at around 42W.
The review unit gets through a day without problems, but it'll certainly be into the red and close to done after about 15 hours of use; the OnePlus 15R has a much meatier battery to last longer.
It's only an 80mAh increase over last year — small fry next to budget rivals like the Poco M8 Pro, which uses silicon-carbon tech to reach 6,500mAh.
50W wired charging is very respectable at this price — besting anything Google, Apple or Samsung offers below £500.
Because the processor isn't power-hungry and the battery is large for the chip, real-world battery life is excellent.
Roughly 13 hours of continuous playback at maximum brightness in a streaming test — impressive for what Nothing is doing at this price.
Samsung Galaxy S23
3,900mAh — the family's weakest point. Real-world ~5-6 hours of SOT typical (worsened by One UI 6/7), and only 25W charging means ~1h12m to full. The compact form factor's main cost.
3,900mAh battery — only 200mAh more than the S22, no 4,500mAh+ like the Plus. The smallest cell in the family.
Real-world: ~5-6 hours of SOT typical, comfortably a full day of moderate use, 1-1.5 days possible.
Battery life noticeably dropped after One UI 6 update — owner went from 5-6h SOT on 5G to barely 2h, recommends staying on Android 13 for best results.
Feb 2026 update real-world: ~4h SOT on Wi-Fi, drops to <2h on 5G — battery efficiency has gotten worse with time.
Charging caps at 25W (the Plus and Ultra get 45W): 0-100% takes ~1h12m on Samsung's 25W charger.
Value vs Competition
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro
At $499 it directly undercuts the experience-per-dollar of the same-priced Pixel 10a and iPhone 17e, and several reviewers would take it over the 10a without hesitation. The closest internal threat is its own cheaper sibling, the standard Phone (4a), which shares the same cameras for $150 less.
From the design to the software and cameras, this is a phone that should absolutely not be slept on — at the price of a Pixel 10a, 'I'd take this 10 out of 10 times over a 10a.'
Vibes and great value for under $500 — a balanced all-rounder.
Against its immediate rivals the Pixel 10a and iPhone 17e it looks impressive: a larger, brighter, faster display, more cameras, and Nothing's unique design including the Glyph Matrix.
A premium balanced package with polished software and really good cameras — recommended, even if it's not perfect on the IP rating or front-camera 4K.
The biggest problem for the 4a Pro is its own little brother — the standard 4a costs much less and gets the exact same cameras.
While the (4a)'s design is still the best in the Nothing range, the (4a) Pro is a close second, and its speakers sound better than the standard model's.
Samsung Galaxy S23
$799 launch with the same chip as the $1,199 Ultra — strong value despite the 25W charging and smaller battery. Now $300-400 used, often the best compact-flagship option versus Pixel 7/8 and OnePlus 11.
Launched at $799 with the same Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy chip as the $1,199 Ultra — outstanding flagship value at the base tier.
Engadget verdict: 'A solid phone that's probably not worth the upgrade' from a recent S22 or S21 — Samsung's iterative cadence.
Notebookcheck calls it 'the small S23 that makes the biggest leap' — the S23 family's largest year-over-year improvement is on the standard tier.
Best compact Android flagship at ₹45k in 2024 — still recommended for buyers who want a one-handed phone with good cameras.
vs Pixel 7 — Pixel wins on haptics, one-handed design and software smarts; S23 wins on chip speed, battery life and update commitment.