Nothing Phone (4a) vs Samsung Galaxy A56 5G

Nothing Phone (4a)

A genuine highlight for the price — a big 6.78-inch 120Hz AMOLED that's bright, sharp and HDR-capable, beating similarly priced rivals.

• 6.78-inch AMOLED, 120Hz, 2160Hz PWM, HDR10+, 800 nits typical / 1,600 nits HBM / 4,500 nits peak at 1224x2720 (440ppi).
• The 6.78-inch display is 23% brighter than the 3a, reaching 1,600 nits outdoors with a 4,500-nit HDR peak.
• Brightness goes up to 4,500 nits peak, remaining easily readable outdoors — the display is very strong for this price range and one of the standout features.
• In the real world it hits around 700 nits peak SDR and ~1,550–1,600 nits in HDR, with 460ppi and dynamic 120Hz.

Samsung Galaxy A56 5G

The 6.7-inch FHD+ AMOLED is one of the consistent strengths of this generation — slimmer bezels, 120Hz refresh rate, and a peak brightness of 1,200 nits in high-brightness mode plus a claimed 1,900 nits in HDR. It is not LTPO, lacks the S25 Ultra's anti-reflective coating, and the chin bezel is uneven, but every reviewer agrees Samsung delivers the best mid-range display.

• Brightness has been boosted to a 1,900-nit HDR peak and 1,200 nits in high-brightness mode, leaving no real complaint about outdoor visibility on a sunny day.
• The 6.67-inch panel measured up to 2,001 cd/m² in lab tests — super sharp despite a slightly lower pixel density than rivals.
• Brighter and bigger display with HDR10+ support is a clear win, but bezels are still thicker than competing mid-rangers like the OnePlus Nord 4.
• Bezels are slightly smaller than the A55 but they're not uniform — there's still a noticeable chin, which cheaper rivals like the Nothing Phone 3a manage to avoid.
• The screen is quite reflective and gets a little smudgier than Galaxy S series phones, but it's been problem-free in daily use.
• Samsung needs to bring the anti-reflective screen coating from the S25 Ultra to the rest of its smartphones — that one feature would make the A56 truly stand out.
• Coming from the washed-out LCD-feeling A55, the A56's bright, sharp, super-saturated AMOLED is a genuinely amazing upgrade.

Nothing Phone (4a)

A capable mid-range chip that handles everyday use and casual gaming well — not a powerhouse, but appropriate for the price.

• Gaming is absolutely possible on this device, with solid everyday performance for the class.
• There's no shortage of substantial hardware upgrades over the 3a, even if the design doesn't stand out as much as the Pro.
• After 24 hours the home screen is extremely customisable and feels massively more functional than iOS, with no responsiveness complaints.
• Gesture-based navigation is fully supported and the overall experience is good thanks to Nothing's optimisations.

Samsung Galaxy A56 5G

Samsung's in-house 4nm Exynos 1580 replaces last year's 1480 with claimed gains of 18% CPU, 17% GPU and 12% NPU. Reviewers agree it's smooth for everyday use, but unanimously call out throttling and surface heat in demanding games — and rivals running Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (OnePlus 13R) or Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 (Poco X7 Pro) win on raw throughput at similar prices.

• Geekbench 6 hits 1,363 single-core / 3,881 multi-core / 6,943 GPU — a clear step up from the A55 (1,150 / 3,457 / 3,083) and comfortably ahead of the Nothing Phone 3a Pro.
• The whole experience feels snappy and responsive coming straight from Snapdragon 8 Elite flagships — the average user wouldn't be able to tell the two apart in normal use.
• There's a 15% larger vapor chamber, but the chipset still lacks the graphical grunt to power top-end AAA games at high quality and high textures.
• Running Genshin Impact shows visibly dropped frame rates and reduced in-game graphics — fine for casual games like Last War, but not for heavy 3D titles.
• The phone gets really hot during gaming and when used as a navigation device with voice prompts.
• Decent performance with great thermal behavior in lab tests — but a good portion of the A56's competitors outperform it on raw performance and charging.
• Offers noticeable performance improvements during everyday use and beat lots of competitor devices in benchmarks, but still lags high-end SoCs like the Apple A18.
• If you're deciding between the A36 and A56 and plan to game, the A56's Exynos 1580 is meaningfully better than the A36's Snapdragon 6 Gen 3.

Nothing Phone (4a)

A ~5,080mAh cell with 50W wired charging — reviewers call endurance strong, but a notable group of owners report disappointing screen-on time.

• The Nothing Phone (4a) features a ~5,080mAh cell which delivers very strong endurance in everyday use.
• The battery grew slightly — about 80mAh in most markets but a more meaningful 400mAh in India — with a 50W PD unit recommended on the box.
• Several owners report only 4–6.5 hours of screen-on time with moderate use — worse than other phones with similar ~5,000mAh batteries.
• Battery life on this phone is excellent in everyday use.

Samsung Galaxy A56 5G

The 5,000mAh cell carries over unchanged and combined with the more efficient Exynos 1580 comfortably clears a full day, with some reviewers reporting near-two-day life under light use. The headline upgrade is 45W wired charging (matching the S25 Ultra) — though Samsung doesn't include a charger in the box. No wireless charging in any region is a consistent complaint.

• The 5,000mAh battery does a good job of making the Galaxy A56 a two-day phone provided you aren't playing games for hours — a 30-minute YouTube video takes only 4%.
• Battery never struggled to get through a full day with around 3-4 hours of screen time, ending most days with 30-35% remaining.
• The 45W charging hits 50% in 24 minutes and 100% in 73 minutes — 10 minutes faster than last year's A55.
• 45W charging hits around a 65% charge in 30 minutes — but there's no charger in the box in many regions and no wireless charging at all.
• It's hard to applaud an upgrade to 45W charging when such speeds should be considered standard on most phones today.
• No charger in the box, not particularly fast to charge given the competition, and no wireless charging — all consistent A56 cons.
• 5,000 mAh ensures long runtimes and full charge takes around 71 minutes at up to 45W — but the phone unfortunately doesn't support wireless charging.
• Battery easily lasts 2 days with typical usage and settings — a clear bright spot of the upgrade.