Poco X7 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S25+

Poco X7 Pro

Poco

7.9

Good

Samsung Galaxy S25+

Samsung

8.3

Great

What Reviewers Agree On

Best gaming performance under $400 — Dimensity 8400-Ultra dominates the mid-range
Display quality with 3,200 nits brightness is flagship-level at a budget price
6,000mAh battery with 90W charging provides excellent all-day endurance
IP68 water resistance is a standout feature at this price point
Camera system is the weakest link — ultrawide and selfie are notably poor

Deal Breakers

Heavy bloatware including ~8 preinstalled games, TikTok, and ads in system UI
Selfie camera is upscaled from 5MP — among the worst at any price

Detailed Comparison

Design & Build

Poco X7 Pro

The first Poco phone with IP68 water resistance, featuring a flat frame design and Gorilla Glass 7i protection. The Yellow Signature Edition with eco-leather back stands out as premium-feeling, though standard models use plain plastic. At 195g and 8.3mm thick, it balances the large battery well.

First Poco phone with IP68 water resistance — unprecedented at under $400
Yellow Signature Edition with eco-leather back feels genuinely premium
Standard green and black models are plain plastic — less premium than the leather variant

Samsung Galaxy S25+

The S25+ features a sleek, refined design with flat edges and Gorilla Glass Victus 2 on both sides. While not dramatically different from the S24+, it's slightly thinner and lighter, earning praise for its premium feel.

The flat-edge design gives it a more modern, premium look compared to previous generations
Build quality is excellent with Armor Aluminum frame, though it lacks the Ultra's titanium

TechTalkTown may earn a commission from purchases made through links below. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. This does not influence our reviews. Learn more.

Buy Poco X7 Pro

AmazonCheck price

Buy Samsung Galaxy S25+

AmazonCheck price

People Also Compare

Poco X7 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Samsung Galaxy S25+ vs Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Poco X7 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S26+Samsung Galaxy S25+ vs Samsung Galaxy S26+Poco X7 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy S26 Samsung Galaxy S25+ vs Samsung Galaxy S26 Poco X7 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold Samsung Galaxy S25+ vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold OnePlus 15 vs Poco X7 Pro OnePlus 15 vs Samsung Galaxy S25+Oppo Find X9 Pro vs Poco X7 Pro

Browse all products

Display

Poco X7 Pro

The 6.67-inch AMOLED display punches well above its price class with 1220x2712 resolution, 120Hz refresh, 12-bit color depth, and an astounding 3,200 nits peak brightness. Dolby Vision and HDR10+ support make it excellent for media consumption.

3,200 nits peak brightness with Dolby Vision and HDR10+ — flagship-level at a budget price
1220x2712 resolution at 120Hz with 12-bit color depth — sharper than most phones in its class
No LTPO means limited refresh rate granularity — either 60Hz or 120Hz

Samsung Galaxy S25+

The 6.7-inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X display is universally praised as one of the best in the industry, with QHD+ resolution, 120Hz refresh rate, and exceptional brightness for outdoor visibility.

The QHD+ AMOLED display is stunning with vibrant colors and deep blacks — one of the best screens available
Peak brightness of 2,600 nits makes it easily readable even in direct sunlight
120Hz adaptive refresh rate is smooth and responsive for scrolling and gaming

Battery Life

Poco X7 Pro

The 6,000mAh battery provides excellent all-day endurance with 6-9 hours of real-world screen-on time. 90W HyperCharge does 0-100% in about 46 minutes. Expert Reviews measured 21 hours 43 minutes in their looping video test. The charger is included in the box in some markets.

6,000mAh battery delivers 6-9 hours SOT depending on usage — excellent for the price class
90W HyperCharge goes from 0-100% in approximately 46 minutes — 90W charger included in some markets
Some users report battery drain issues with weak 5G or Wi-Fi signal

Samsung Galaxy S25+

The 4,900mAh battery comfortably lasts a full day for most users, with the Snapdragon 8 Elite's efficiency helping extend endurance. Charging speeds remain adequate but not class-leading.

Battery easily lasts a full day with moderate to heavy use — a noticeable improvement over the S24+
45W wired charging gets you to 65% in 30 minutes, which is competitive but not the fastest
15W wireless charging and reverse wireless charging round out the charging options