Google Pixel 10 Pro vs Nothing Phone (4a) Pro | TechTalkTown
Google Pixel 10 Pro vs Nothing Phone (4a) Pro
Google Pixel 10 Pro
Google
8.3
Powerful smartphone, weak heart
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro
Nothing
8.5
The $499 phone to beat
Google Pixel 10 Pro
What Reviewers Agree On
Camera system is the family's headline — 50MP f/1.7 main + 48MP ultrawide + 48MP 5x telephoto with the new Tensor G5 ISP. BGR: 'The Best Android Has To Offer Right Now' is the title of their full review.
6.3-inch QHD+ LTPO OLED at 3,300 nits peak is class-leading at the size — GSMArena measured 2,351 nits adaptive, 'comfortably brighter than anything that's not a Pixel.'
Seven years of OS + security updates plus 26 quarterly Pixel feature drops keeps the phone gaining features rather than just patches — six months in, AirDrop support and automatic notification organization have already shipped.
16GB RAM standard across all Pro configurations + UFS 4.0 storage option from 256GB up — flagship-tier specs in every dimension that isn't compute or charging speed.
Pixelsnap (Qi2 magnetic wireless) plus Pixel Pro tier exclusive Video Boost cloud processing — the Pro retains differentiation over the base $799 Pixel 10.
Pros & Cons
Google Pixel 10 Pro
Pros
Camera system is the family's headline — 50MP f/1.7 main + 48MP ultrawide + 48MP 5x telephoto with the new Tensor G5 ISP. BGR: 'The Best Android Has To Offer Right Now' is the title of their full review.
6.3-inch QHD+ LTPO OLED at 3,300 nits peak is class-leading at the size — GSMArena measured 2,351 nits adaptive, 'comfortably brighter than anything that's not a Pixel.'
Seven years of OS + security updates plus 26 quarterly Pixel feature drops keeps the phone gaining features rather than just patches — six months in, AirDrop support and automatic notification organization have already shipped.
16GB RAM standard across all Pro configurations + UFS 4.0 storage option from 256GB up — flagship-tier specs in every dimension that isn't compute or charging speed.
Detailed Comparison
Display
Google Pixel 10 Pro
6.3-inch LTPO OLED, 1280×2856 QHD+, 120Hz adaptive refresh, HBM at 2,200 nits, peak at 3,300 nits. GSMArena's lab measurement: 2,351 nits adaptive in 75% lit area — 'comfortably brighter than anything that's not a Pixel — the iPhone 16 Pro is some 600nits behind.'
6.3-inch LTPO OLED with 120Hz adaptive refresh, 1280×2856 QHD+, 495 PPI — same physical size as the Pixel 9 Pro with brightness boosted to a class-leading 3,300 nits peak.
Real-world brightness verdict: '2,351nits with adaptive brightness enabled - virtually the same result as the Pixel 9 Pro. It's comfortably brighter than anything that's not a Pixel - the iPhone 16 Pro is some 600nits behind.'
Linus Tech Tips measurement: 'we measuring a peak luminance of 3,378 nits for the Pixel 10 Pro... this is considerably brighter than last gen Pixel phones with the 10 Pro series measuring 10% brighter than the Pixel 9 Pro XL in SDR and 15% brighter in HDR.'
Adaptive refresh matches content frame rate exactly: 'if it's a 24fps video, the display will maintain 24Hz, and if it's a 90Hz game, the display will maintain 90Hz' — granular battery-saving LTPO behavior.
TechTalkTown may earn a commission from purchases made through links below. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. This does not influence our reviews. Learn more.
Tensor G5 falls behind Snapdragon and Apple flagships in every benchmark — Linus Tech Tips measured the Pro at '88% of the single core performance, 67% of the multi-core performance, and just 55% of the GPU performance' versus the Galaxy S25 Edge.
Battery capacity barely improved over the Pixel 9 Pro — '4,870mAh - it's not by much - it's just 170mAh on top of the Pixel 9 Pro's 4,700mAh' per GSMArena, and the same 30W charging spec hits a real-world peak of only 23W.
TechRadar verdict: 'the poor performance is unforgivable' — at $999 the Pro tier's chipset trails $800 phones by wide margins on every standard benchmark.
Notebookcheck title sums up the divisive verdict: 'Powerful smartphone with weak heart' — flagship build, camera, and display let down by mid-range silicon.
Charging speed is the family's weakest spec — '0 to 45% in half an hour, and a full charge took an hour and 40 minutes' (Notebookcheck lab test). Behind iPhone 17 Pro, Samsung S26, and far behind Chinese flagship 80-100W chargers.
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro
What Reviewers Agree On
The new metal unibody makes the 4a Pro look and feel more premium than Nothing's own £799 Phone 3 — the slimmest, most 'pro'-feeling Nothing yet.
The 6.83-inch 1.5K 144Hz AMOLED is the best display Nothing has ever shipped, with strong real-world outdoor visibility around its realistic 1,600-nit figure.
The dual 50MP main plus 50MP 3.5x periscope-telephoto system is rare flagship-tier camera hardware at $499 and the single biggest reason to buy.
Nothing OS 4.1 on Android 16 is clean, bloat-free and has some of the best design consistency of any Android UI, Google included.
At $499 — the exact price of a Pixel 10a — it's outstanding value, with several reviewers preferring it outright to the 10a.
50W wired charging beats anything Google, Apple or Samsung offer below £500.
Deal Breakers
Only 3 years of OS updates (6 years of security patches) — well behind the 7 years Google and Samsung give at this price.
No wireless charging at all — sacrificed for the metal back.
The battery is only an 80mAh increase over last year and runs marginal next to 6,000–7,000mAh budget rivals.
Measured brightness (~700 nits SDR, ~1,550 HDR) is nowhere near the 5,000-nit headline.
The camera is inconsistent — low-light and deep zoom are merely average rather than class-leading.
Pixelsnap (Qi2 magnetic wireless) plus Pixel Pro tier exclusive Video Boost cloud processing — the Pro retains differentiation over the base $799 Pixel 10.
Cons
Tensor G5 falls behind Snapdragon and Apple flagships in every benchmark — Linus Tech Tips measured the Pro at '88% of the single core performance, 67% of the multi-core performance, and just 55% of the GPU performance' versus the Galaxy S25 Edge.
Battery capacity barely improved over the Pixel 9 Pro — '4,870mAh - it's not by much - it's just 170mAh on top of the Pixel 9 Pro's 4,700mAh' per GSMArena, and the same 30W charging spec hits a real-world peak of only 23W.
TechRadar verdict: 'the poor performance is unforgivable' — at $999 the Pro tier's chipset trails $800 phones by wide margins on every standard benchmark.
Notebookcheck title sums up the divisive verdict: 'Powerful smartphone with weak heart' — flagship build, camera, and display let down by mid-range silicon.
Charging speed is the family's weakest spec — '0 to 45% in half an hour, and a full charge took an hour and 40 minutes' (Notebookcheck lab test). Behind iPhone 17 Pro, Samsung S26, and far behind Chinese flagship 80-100W chargers.
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro
Pros
The new metal unibody makes the 4a Pro look and feel more premium than Nothing's own £799 Phone 3 — the slimmest, most 'pro'-feeling Nothing yet.
The 6.83-inch 1.5K 144Hz AMOLED is the best display Nothing has ever shipped, with strong real-world outdoor visibility around its realistic 1,600-nit figure.
The dual 50MP main plus 50MP 3.5x periscope-telephoto system is rare flagship-tier camera hardware at $499 and the single biggest reason to buy.
Nothing OS 4.1 on Android 16 is clean, bloat-free and has some of the best design consistency of any Android UI, Google included.
At $499 — the exact price of a Pixel 10a — it's outstanding value, with several reviewers preferring it outright to the 10a.
50W wired charging beats anything Google, Apple or Samsung offer below £500.
Cons
Only 3 years of OS updates (6 years of security patches) — well behind the 7 years Google and Samsung give at this price.
No wireless charging at all — sacrificed for the metal back.
The battery is only an 80mAh increase over last year and runs marginal next to 6,000–7,000mAh budget rivals.
Measured brightness (~700 nits SDR, ~1,550 HDR) is nowhere near the 5,000-nit headline.
The camera is inconsistent — low-light and deep zoom are merely average rather than class-leading.
Display flickering bug at launch — fuzzy screen issues affecting some users were addressed in an October OTA per a long-term reviewer: 'now that Google released an update to help with some users having these fuzzy screen issues.'
6-month durability: 'the screen holds up even beside like it's, you know, devices that came out after Pixel 10 Pro. Like it's going to have to hold up on its own.' — display quality holds up well long-term per 5-month review.
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro
A 6.83-inch 1.5K AMOLED at 144Hz with 2,160Hz PWM dimming — reviewers agree it's the best screen Nothing has built, with realistic outdoor brightness around 1,600 nits. The headline 5,000-nit peak, though, only materialises with special HDR test files; everyday brightness is far lower.
Nothing's best-ever display: a 144Hz panel with 1,600 nits of outdoor brightness and a claimed 5,000 nits peak; the main camera is solid too with nice detail and well-reproduced colours.
A claimed 1,600-nit outdoor brightness is realistic — no major visibility issues outdoors even in strong sunshine, putting it among the best affordable phones, and Nothing OS has some of the best design consistency of any Android UI.
The 4,500-nit HDR peak was only validated with specific HDR test files, not actual video playback — real-world output is around 700 nits in SDR and 1,550–1,600 in HDR.
The '5,000-nit peak brightness' spec means nothing in practice — a marketing figure pulled from a single-pixel measurement.
144Hz refresh (vs 120Hz on the regular 4a) and 1,600 nits white brightness / 5,000 nits peak, marketed as 66% brighter than the Phone (3a) series — though there's no extra output on a small 10% window.
High-frequency PWM dimming makes it better suited to users sensitive to screen flicker, although slight flickering is still present.
Cameras
Google Pixel 10 Pro
50MP main f/1.7 (1/1.31" sensor, dual-pixel PDAF, OIS) + 48MP ultrawide f/1.7 + 48MP 5x telephoto f/2.8. Adds 8K cloud-upscaled video. Pocket-lint titles their review 'The best Android smartphone you can buy' on the strength of this camera system; SuperSaf's comparison vs Galaxy S25 Ultra finds night-mode struggles and video below the iPhone 17 Pro.
50MP main f/1.7 (24mm, 1/1.31" sensor, 1.2µm pixel) + 48MP ultrawide f/1.7 (123° FOV) + 48MP 5x telephoto f/2.8 (113mm) — Stuff Pixel 10 Pro XL camera setup matches the Pixel 10 Pro exactly.
Pocket-lint review title says it best: 'Pixel 10 Pro review: The best Android smartphone you can buy.' Camera system is the headline reason.
BGR Pixel 10 Pro headline: 'Google Pixel 10 Pro Review: The Best Android Has To Offer Right Now.'
Night sight verdict per Stuff: 'In darker environments, Google's Night Sight still shines as one of the best low light modes on any smartphone.'
vs iPhone 17 Pro video comparison per Dave2D: 'the fires look way better on the iPhone 16 Pro Max compared to the Pixel 10 Pro XL. The Pixel is so much worse at just this low light front-facing video compared to the iPhone.'
Camera Coach AI feature analyzes a framed shot and offers composition tips — useful for amateur photographers per Dave2D. Per a long-term review: 'I honestly felt it was very beneficial for people who are probably not good at taking photos.'
Algorithmic refinement vs raw photography: Halide camera app created 'Process Zero' mode that 'strips the images of any algorithmic refinement whatsoever' — Pixel processing is now so aggressive that third-party apps offer bypass modes.
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro
The headline value play: a 50MP Sony LYT-710 main with OIS, a true 50MP 3.5x periscope telephoto (80mm) with OIS, and an 8MP ultrawide — flagship-tier hardware Samsung and Apple don't put in phones at this price. Output is characterful and the telephoto is a genuine win, but reviewers consistently flag inconsistency, average low-light and a gimmicky 140x digital zoom.
Triple rear system: 50MP Sony LYT-710 main (f/1.9, OIS), 8MP ultrawide, and a 50MP periscope telephoto with 3.5x optical zoom (80mm, f/2.9, OIS).
Both the main and periscope-zoom cameras are 50MP and deliver strong results for this price range; the zoom in particular stands out from competitors and even allows for extreme digital zoom.
Having a proper dedicated telephoto shooter is a genuine love, although the camera experience itself is a little bit inconsistent at times.
It's not clinically the best camera, but the shots have a bit more soul to them.
Performance
Google Pixel 10 Pro
Tensor G5 on TSMC 3nm with 16GB RAM. Marketing claims 30% CPU and 60% TPU improvements over Tensor G4, but lab measurements put the Pro at 88% single-core, 67% multi-core, and 55% GPU performance vs Snapdragon-class Galaxy S25 Edge. UI feels fluid; sustained loads throttle hard.
Tensor G5 on TSMC 3nm with 16GB LPDDR5X RAM standard across the Pro lineup — Google claims '34% faster than last year's G4 chip' (W8bKwxZYMlg) and Linus measured 'a 17% increase in single core performance and around a 36% increase in multi-core performance compared to the Pixel 9 Pro XL.'
Direct competitor gap per Linus: 'the Pixel significantly falls behind in benchmarks compared to the Galaxy S25 Edge with both the 10 Pro and 10 Pro XL getting around 88% of the single core performance, 67% of the multi-core performance, and just 55% of the GPU performance.'
Stress-test sustainability: 'the story is pretty much the same with minor gains over the Pixel 9 series and only 50% of the S25 Edge's max output in its standard performance mode' — Tensor G5 collapses under sustained load.
Notebookcheck stress test: 'In our prolonged stress tests, the phone underwent significant throttling down to around 40% of its max CPU performance.'
Genshin Impact reality check per GSMArena: 'a visually demanding title such as Genshin Impact cannot maintain 60fps on the Pixel 10 Pro XL at its maximum settings, and the phone would routinely drop into the 50s or even the 40s.'
Real-world fluidity verdict: 'Pixel UI is generally really fluid and the Tensor chip still holds up enough that day-to-day usage is wicked fast and smooth' — gap mostly invisible outside benchmarks/gaming.
TSMC migration is a real architectural shift: 'Google moved their chip manufacturing to TSMC, where past tensor chips were manufactured by Samsung. TSMC produced Apple's beastly A series of chips for the iPhone.' — Long-term efficiency benefits expected.
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro
The Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 with UFS 3.1 storage is a clear, tangible step up from the Phone (3a) generation — Nothing claims +27% CPU, +30% GPU and +65% AI. It's a perfectly capable everyday chip that feels noticeably quicker, but it's explicitly not a gaming powerhouse and warms up under sustained heavy load.
Backed by OS optimisations and a custom CPU scheduler, the chipset delivers 27% better CPU, 30% better GPU and 65% better AI performance than the Nothing Phone (3a); storage is 147% faster in reads and 380% faster in writes.
Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 is a perfectly acceptable chip across the board, and the upgrade to UFS 3.1 makes this feel noticeably quicker compared to the Nothing Phone (3a) and prior.
The CPU performance difference between the 4a Pro and the vanilla 4a is not massive, but it is still very much notable.
Available in 8GB+128GB, 8GB+256GB and 12GB+256GB configurations, all running near-stock AOSP-style Nothing OS.
Like most phones in this segment, it shows some basic heat build-up during really extensive tasks like gaming or 4K editing in high-end software, though it stays responsive while gaming.
Battery & Charging
Google Pixel 10 Pro
4,870 mAh battery (+170 mAh vs Pixel 9 Pro), 30W wired charging with a real-world peak of 23W, 15W Pixelsnap Qi2 magnetic wireless. Notebookcheck's lab measurement: '9 hours and 53 minutes' overall active use score — below 2025 average. Real-world long-term reports vary from 'fine, all-day' to 'sits below 30% at end of day with light use.'
4,870 mAh battery — only 170 mAh up from the Pixel 9 Pro per GSMArena: 'On the 10 non-Pro they managed to fit an extra 270mAh compared to its predecessor, but the 10 Pro couldn't squeeze in quite as much.'
Wired charging real-world peak: 'Testing with the 30W Google adapter, we got a momentary peak at just under 23W and about 15 minutes in the low 20s in the early stages of the charging process' — peak wattage is much lower than the rated 30W.
Notebookcheck active-use score: 'an overall active use score of just 9 hours and 53 minutes... lower and below average for 2025' — substantially behind iPhone 17 Pro and S25 Ultra in the same test class.
Full charge time per Notebookcheck: '0 to 45% in half an hour, and a full charge took an hour and 40 minutes' — full top-up is over an hour and a half, behind iPhone 17 Pro Max and Galaxy S25 Ultra.
User long-term real-world: 'In my use case, the battery life on the 10 Pro has been good, getting me around 7 to 8 hours of screen on time and ending with about 20% remaining, which is comparable to the iPhone 16 and the S25.'
Light-use 1-month report: 'in the entire month that I've been using this phone, there have only been a handful of days with very light use where the phone has been sitting above 30% at the end of the day' — heavier users struggle.
67W charger compatibility: 'We later obtained the recently released 67W dual-port Google charger... still provided the same peak of 23W as the 30W charger, but for longer' — even using a higher-spec charger doesn't unlock faster speeds.
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro
The ~5,080mAh cell reliably gets through a day and endurance improved across all of GSMArena's tests versus the 3a Pro — but it's only an 80mAh bump over last year and looks small next to 6,000–7,000mAh budget rivals. 50W wired charging is the trade-off win; there is no wireless charging at all.
Endurance has improved across the board in all tests compared to last year's Nothing Phone (3a) Pro; with a 68W USB-PD charger the phone peaked at around 42W.
The review unit gets through a day without problems, but it'll certainly be into the red and close to done after about 15 hours of use; the OnePlus 15R has a much meatier battery to last longer.
It's only an 80mAh increase over last year — small fry next to budget rivals like the Poco M8 Pro, which uses silicon-carbon tech to reach 6,500mAh.
50W wired charging is very respectable at this price — besting anything Google, Apple or Samsung offers below £500.
Because the processor isn't power-hungry and the battery is large for the chip, real-world battery life is excellent.
Software & AI
Google Pixel 10 Pro
Android 16 with Material 3 Expressive, seven years of OS + Pixel feature drops (26 more remaining as of 6-month mark). Pro tier ships with one year of free Google AI Pro (Gemini Pro + 2TB storage). AirDrop support, automatic notification organization, and bold caller imagery have all been added via Pixel Drops since launch.
Seven years of OS + security updates plus quarterly feature drops — 'still 6 and 12 years of software support to go, which includes a whopping 26 Pixel drops remaining for the Pixel 10 Pro before Google ends software support for it.'
AirDrop support added post-launch — '6 months later, one of the biggest and most unexpected updates to the Pixel 10 Pro was support for AirDrop' — meaningful feature drop a Pixel had never had before.
Material 3 Expressive verdict per a 6-month reviewer: 'It still has moments where it feels like it needs one more polish pass to look fully expensive. People love that Google is trying new and interesting things.'
One year of free Google AI Pro included with the Pro tier: 'The Pixel 10 Pro, Pro XL, and Pro Fold will include one year of free Google AI Pro, which includes Gemini Pro, 2 TB of storage, and more' — value-add normally $20/month.
Class 3 face unlock + ultrasonic fingerprint + Pixel software: 'one thing about the Google Pixels is that you can unlock your applications and your passwords and your banking apps with your face unlock which is the only Android phone in the world that can do that.'
Software bugginess reality per GSMArena: 'one thing that has always remained consistent with using new Pixel devices is the sheer bugginess of the software' — even with 7-year promise, day-one polish remains a Pixel weakness.
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro
Nothing OS 4.1 on Android 16 is the universal favourite: near-stock AOSP functionality with a distinctive monochrome visual identity, almost no bloatware, and AI that's present but not forced. The one hard reservation is update length — only 3 years of OS upgrades against 6 years of security patches.
Nothing OS sticks close to a clean, near-stock Android (AOSP) experience in functionality, but stands out with its distinctive visual identity.
After a week the phone is 'absolutely brilliant'; software is where Nothing phones shine, even if the camera 'window' at the top of the display is basically a pseudo-iPhone look.
Software is where Nothing phones absolutely shine — the clearest reason to pick this over rivals.
There's a smattering of AI here, but it's not shoved down your throat — and the software is basically the same clean setup as the regular Nothing Phone (4a).
Unlike Samsung's Galaxy AI which is in your face from day one, Nothing's AI stays out of the way — an impressive, restrained package overall.
Design & Build
Google Pixel 10 Pro
Premium glass back, polished aluminum frame, IP68 rating, 152.4 × 71.1 × 7.6 mm at 207g. Camera bar signature carried over with subtle refinements — slimmer bezel around the rear camera bar, second speaker opening at the bottom, SIM tray moved to the top (or dropped entirely on US models). Pixelsnap magnets built in.
Premium materials per Snazzy Labs hands-on: 'right out of the box, it feels like Google's most refined piece of hardware yet. The texture, the edges, even the subtle matte frame, it all feels incredibly premium.'
Dimensions per Unbox Therapy: '152.4 mm tall, 71.1 mm wide, and 7.6 mm thick with a weight of roughly 207 g' — compact 6.3-inch Pro form factor in the family.
Repairability win — JerryRigEverything: 'With the new, near-foolproof screen removal process, a new removable battery, and most importantly, genuine replacement parts available from iFixit, plus the free repair manual, I think the Google Pixel 10 Pro is on track for the most repairable smartphone of the year.'
SIM tray dropped in US models (eSIM only, like iPhone) — SuperSaf: 'they've dropped the SIM card, the physical SIM card support in the US, just like the iPhone.'
Second speaker opening + slimmed bezels — SuperSaf: 'Google made the phone's rear G logo metallic, slimmed and bezel around the rear camera bar, moved the SIM card tray to the top of the phone, and added a second speaker opening to the bottom.'
1-month design verdict: 'whilst there is a lot to like about the Pixel 10 Pro's design, it's actually currently my least favorite out of Google's entire lineup' — dissenting view from a Pro reviewer.
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro
The defining change this generation: a metal unibody that ditches the transparent back for a minimal lower half and a distinctive rectangular camera island, topped by a slimmed-down Glyph Matrix. Reviewers overwhelmingly call it the slimmest, most premium Nothing ever — but the redesign is genuinely polarising, and the IP65 rating is one notch below the flagship norm.
A $499 phone that looks and feels higher-end than last year's flagship Phone 3, helped in large part by the new metal design.
An upgraded metal unibody ditches the iconic transparent back for a more minimal look in the bottom half, while a new rectangular camera island in Nothing's distinctive style helps it stand out.
It's the slimmest Nothing phone ever and just feels more pro and more premium in the hand.
The Glyph Matrix uses 137 mini-LEDs that are 57% larger and twice as bright as the Phone 3's interface — and the silver version is the best-looking, while the black metal can look almost plasti-dipped.
Value vs Competition
Google Pixel 10 Pro
$999 starting price (128GB), 256GB at $1,099, up to 1TB. Includes one year of Google AI Pro (normally $20/month = $240 value). Competes head-to-head with the iPhone 17 Pro ($1,099) and Galaxy S26 ($999). Reviewers split on whether the Pro tier justifies $200 over the base Pixel 10.
$999 starting price (128GB) per MacRumors — undercuts iPhone 17 Pro and Galaxy S26 Ultra, but $300 below the Pro XL and $200 above the equally Tensor-G5-powered base Pixel 10.
Digital Trends ongoing review verdict: 'A major upgrade last year for the ninth edition made the Pixel 9 Pro the best phone you can buy, but the more modest upgrades in the Pixel 10 Pro make it far less exciting than I was hoping for.'
Pocket-lint headline endorsement: 'Pixel 10 Pro review: The best Android smartphone you can buy.'
TechRadar verdict: 'Google Pixel 10 Pro review: surprisingly, I loved the AI features, but the poor performance is unforgivable.'
Engadget Pro vs Pro XL headline: 'Google Pixel 10 Pro and Pro XL review: Redefining the smart in smartphone.'
vs OnePlus 15 reality check per a long-term reviewer: 'I picked up the OnePlus 15 for less than I bought the Pixel 10 for' yet got 'a frankly ridiculous 102% better single core score and 129% better multi-core score' on Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5.
Nothing Phone (4a) Pro
At $499 it directly undercuts the experience-per-dollar of the same-priced Pixel 10a and iPhone 17e, and several reviewers would take it over the 10a without hesitation. The closest internal threat is its own cheaper sibling, the standard Phone (4a), which shares the same cameras for $150 less.
From the design to the software and cameras, this is a phone that should absolutely not be slept on — at the price of a Pixel 10a, 'I'd take this 10 out of 10 times over a 10a.'
Vibes and great value for under $500 — a balanced all-rounder.
Against its immediate rivals the Pixel 10a and iPhone 17e it looks impressive: a larger, brighter, faster display, more cameras, and Nothing's unique design including the Glyph Matrix.
A premium balanced package with polished software and really good cameras — recommended, even if it's not perfect on the IP rating or front-camera 4K.
The biggest problem for the 4a Pro is its own little brother — the standard 4a costs much less and gets the exact same cameras.
Low-light performance isn't the best, and image quality when you zoom right in isn't the best out there — not bad, just not class-leading.
The 140x zoom headline grabs attention, but in use it's more about how far the camera can push digitally than something you'd rely on day-to-day.
Not super impressed by the camera or the giant protruding bumps the lenses sit in.
It's by no means a top-notch gaming phone, although the processor is better than the regular 4a's and squeezes out a bit more performance and FPS.
Roughly 13 hours of continuous playback at maximum brightness in a streaming test — impressive for what Nothing is doing at this price.
Nothing's take on Android 16 has some of the best design consistency you'll find on any Android UI, Google included.
It's IP65 dust- and splash-resistant — one step below the IP64-rated regular Phone (4a) only on splash, and below the IP68 some early articles wrongly listed; the Glyph is massively slimmed from the Phone 3's 489 lights down to 137.
The 4a's design is gorgeous, but the Pro 'looks like an AI-generated design' — Nothing's look is now seen by some as a parody of its original transparent, Teenage Engineering-like identity.
Even people who don't always love Nothing's designs appreciate that the brand is trying to make a phone more unique than a 'plain black glass slab'.
While the (4a)'s design is still the best in the Nothing range, the (4a) Pro is a close second, and its speakers sound better than the standard model's.