Google Pixel 10 Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra

Google Pixel 10 Pro

50MP main f/1.7 (1/1.31" sensor, dual-pixel PDAF, OIS) + 48MP ultrawide f/1.7 + 48MP 5x telephoto f/2.8. Adds 8K cloud-upscaled video. Pocket-lint titles their review 'The best Android smartphone you can buy' on the strength of this camera system; SuperSaf's comparison vs Galaxy S25 Ultra finds night-mode struggles and video below the iPhone 17 Pro.

• 50MP main f/1.7 (24mm, 1/1.31" sensor, 1.2µm pixel) + 48MP ultrawide f/1.7 (123° FOV) + 48MP 5x telephoto f/2.8 (113mm) — Stuff Pixel 10 Pro XL camera setup matches the Pixel 10 Pro exactly.
• Pocket-lint review title says it best: 'Pixel 10 Pro review: The best Android smartphone you can buy.' Camera system is the headline reason.
• BGR Pixel 10 Pro headline: 'Google Pixel 10 Pro Review: The Best Android Has To Offer Right Now.'
• 8K cloud upscaling and 10-bit HDR rear video: 'Rear camera: 8K@30fps (via cloud-based upscaling), 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@24/30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS, 10-bit HDR.'
• Night sight verdict per Stuff: 'In darker environments, Google's Night Sight still shines as one of the best low light modes on any smartphone.'
• vs iPhone 17 Pro video comparison per Dave2D: 'the fires look way better on the iPhone 16 Pro Max compared to the Pixel 10 Pro XL. The Pixel is so much worse at just this low light front-facing video compared to the iPhone.'
• Camera Coach AI feature analyzes a framed shot and offers composition tips — useful for amateur photographers per Dave2D. Per a long-term review: 'I honestly felt it was very beneficial for people who are probably not good at taking photos.'
• Algorithmic refinement vs raw photography: Halide camera app created 'Process Zero' mode that 'strips the images of any algorithmic refinement whatsoever' — Pixel processing is now so aggressive that third-party apps offer bypass modes.

Vivo X300 Ultra

The reason the X300 Ultra exists: a near-1-inch 200MP 35mm main (Sony Lytia 901), a 200MP 85mm periscope, and the best ultrawide sensor on the market, tuned with Zeiss. Reviewers near-universally rate it the best-equipped camera phone of 2026 — with two important caveats: the 35mm default is divisive, and on raw image quality it's only marginally ahead of the cheaper X300 Pro.

• At the center is a 200MP main that's nearly a 1-inch sensor (Sony Lytia 901), backed by a 200MP 85mm-equivalent periscope telephoto — the phone is focused on camera quality and, even more so, video.
• Featuring three extra-large image sensors, the X300 Ultra's uncompromising camera hardware earned a solid rating — but it's hardly better than the cheaper X300 Pro in actual camera performance despite the top-notch hardware.
• I'm not sure I've seen better results from even 1-inch sensors — it's so close to 1-inch and the 35mm focal length makes for more cinematic-looking shots; the 85mm periscope is the sweet spot for portraits.
• It still holds the record for the best portrait-mode photos on a smartphone, especially at 85mm and 135mm; the 14mm ultrawide is sharp edge to edge.

Google Pixel 10 Pro

Tensor G5 on TSMC 3nm with 16GB RAM. Marketing claims 30% CPU and 60% TPU improvements over Tensor G4, but lab measurements put the Pro at 88% single-core, 67% multi-core, and 55% GPU performance vs Snapdragon-class Galaxy S25 Edge. UI feels fluid; sustained loads throttle hard.

• Tensor G5 on TSMC 3nm with 16GB LPDDR5X RAM standard across the Pro lineup — Google claims '34% faster than last year's G4 chip' (W8bKwxZYMlg) and Linus measured 'a 17% increase in single core performance and around a 36% increase in multi-core performance compared to the Pixel 9 Pro XL.'
• Direct competitor gap per Linus: 'the Pixel significantly falls behind in benchmarks compared to the Galaxy S25 Edge with both the 10 Pro and 10 Pro XL getting around 88% of the single core performance, 67% of the multi-core performance, and just 55% of the GPU performance.'
• Stress-test sustainability: 'the story is pretty much the same with minor gains over the Pixel 9 series and only 50% of the S25 Edge's max output in its standard performance mode' — Tensor G5 collapses under sustained load.
• Notebookcheck stress test: 'In our prolonged stress tests, the phone underwent significant throttling down to around 40% of its max CPU performance.'
• Genshin Impact reality check per GSMArena: 'a visually demanding title such as Genshin Impact cannot maintain 60fps on the Pixel 10 Pro XL at its maximum settings, and the phone would routinely drop into the 50s or even the 40s.'
• Real-world fluidity verdict: 'Pixel UI is generally really fluid and the Tensor chip still holds up enough that day-to-day usage is wicked fast and smooth' — gap mostly invisible outside benchmarks/gaming.
• TSMC migration is a real architectural shift: 'Google moved their chip manufacturing to TSMC, where past tensor chips were manufactured by Samsung. TSMC produced Apple's beastly A series of chips for the iPhone.' — Long-term efficiency benefits expected.

Vivo X300 Ultra

Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 plus Vivo's custom imaging silicon delivers flagship benchmark numbers and strong gaming, but the camera-heavy hardware runs hot — sustained stress tests show roughly 60–65% stability and the camera app warms it up fast.

• At the heart is Qualcomm's current flagship Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, supplemented by Vivo's custom VS1 and V3-Plus imaging chips.
• It boots in 16 seconds (vs 21s for the S26 Ultra and 19s for the iPhone 17 Pro Max) and posts an AnTuTu score over 3,800,000, stronger than Samsung.
• In a prolonged stress test it throttled CPU performance to about 60% of peak — in line with other high-powered flagships — and 3DMark stability landed around 63–66%.
• It gets a bit hot after 30–40 minutes of gaming, but with no throttling even past an hour and never uncomfortable to hold; boost mode at max graphics gives around 4 hours of Wuthering Waves on a full charge.
• Native 120fps gaming with smooth/very-high graphics in many titles, with temperature barely crossing 35°C and power draw around 4W in battle-royale modes.

Google Pixel 10 Pro

4,870 mAh battery (+170 mAh vs Pixel 9 Pro), 30W wired charging with a real-world peak of 23W, 15W Pixelsnap Qi2 magnetic wireless. Notebookcheck's lab measurement: '9 hours and 53 minutes' overall active use score — below 2025 average. Real-world long-term reports vary from 'fine, all-day' to 'sits below 30% at end of day with light use.'

• 4,870 mAh battery — only 170 mAh up from the Pixel 9 Pro per GSMArena: 'On the 10 non-Pro they managed to fit an extra 270mAh compared to its predecessor, but the 10 Pro couldn't squeeze in quite as much.'
• Wired charging real-world peak: 'Testing with the 30W Google adapter, we got a momentary peak at just under 23W and about 15 minutes in the low 20s in the early stages of the charging process' — peak wattage is much lower than the rated 30W.
• Notebookcheck active-use score: 'an overall active use score of just 9 hours and 53 minutes... lower and below average for 2025' — substantially behind iPhone 17 Pro and S25 Ultra in the same test class.
• Full charge time per Notebookcheck: '0 to 45% in half an hour, and a full charge took an hour and 40 minutes' — full top-up is over an hour and a half, behind iPhone 17 Pro Max and Galaxy S25 Ultra.
• User long-term real-world: 'In my use case, the battery life on the 10 Pro has been good, getting me around 7 to 8 hours of screen on time and ending with about 20% remaining, which is comparable to the iPhone 16 and the S25.'
• Light-use 1-month report: 'in the entire month that I've been using this phone, there have only been a handful of days with very light use where the phone has been sitting above 30% at the end of the day' — heavier users struggle.
• 67W charger compatibility: 'We later obtained the recently released 67W dual-port Google charger... still provided the same peak of 23W as the 30W charger, but for longer' — even using a higher-spec charger doesn't unlock faster speeds.

Vivo X300 Ultra

Vivo grew the silicon-carbon cell 10% to 6,600mAh while keeping the body the same size. Real-world endurance is strong — ~16h active-use score, ~7h heavy screen-on, 13–14 hour days with charge to spare — and 100W wired refills it in under an hour, with 40W wireless.

• Vivo increased the battery by 10% to 6,600mAh despite the phone being practically the same size on paper.
• In our battery test it earned an active-use score of almost 16 hours; 100W charging took it 0–66% in 30 minutes and a full charge in 46 minutes, plus 40W wireless. A charger is in the box except in Europe.
• On the China version I'm finishing entire 13–14 hour days with 25–30% left; the global version keeps the 6,600mAh cell so battery life should comfortably last 12–13 hours of heavy use.
• Getting nearly 7 hours of screen-on time with very heavy usage from the 6,600mAh silicon-carbon unit, with 100W wired and 40W wireless charging support.
• After a 4-hour heavy-usage simulation the phone still had ~45% battery left, which is solid by today's standards, and 100W wired charging takes about 45 minutes to full.