Motorola Razr Fold vs Samsung Galaxy S26+

Motorola Razr Fold

Historically the foldable Achilles heel — but Motorola invested in hardware and software here, and DxOMark ranks it the best camera in any foldable.

• DxOMark rates the Razr Fold the #1 camera among foldables — roughly 8th overall across all phones — with a Gold Label.
• A 50MP main (f/1.6, OIS), a 50MP ultrawide (12mm, 122° FOV, f/2.0) and a third 50MP camera — all selfies can use the best 50MP main.
• This is without question the best Motorola camera I've ever used.
• Comes up just short of modern flagships like the iPhone 17 Pro, Find X9 Pro and Xiaomi 17 Ultra, with a DxOMark score of 164 points.
• Took it for a street-photography spin and came away genuinely impressed — the camera hardware was what caught attention.
• Highest-quality camera in a folding phone in the US — better than the Pixel 10 Pro Fold and Galaxy Z Fold 7, which use older sensors.

Samsung Galaxy S26+

The most-criticised aspect of the phone. The S26+ uses the same 50 MP main + 12 MP ultrawide + 10 MP 3x telephoto array Samsung has shipped since the S22+ — fine for landscapes and well-lit shots, mediocre in low light, and frustrating for moving subjects. Software adds Horizontal Lock video and natural-language Photo Assist edits, but the hardware ceiling is showing.

• Same sensors as the S25+, S24+, S23+, and S22+ — Samsung has reused this camera array for five consecutive generations, relying on image-processing improvements for inter-generational gains
• Daylight stills look balanced and natural — colours lean accurate rather than Samsung's old over-saturated style, skies stay realistic, and dynamic range is decent
• PhoneArena's standardised camera test scored the S26+ at 149/158 combined — slightly above the S25+ thanks to processing upgrades, but well behind the Ultra and Chinese rivals
• Low-light performance shows visible colour noise, occasionally blown highlights, and smudgy halos around bright sources — usable but no longer competitive
• Motion blur on moving subjects (kids, pets) is the recurring deal-breaker — Samsung favours a low shutter speed for light gathering, ruining roughly half of action shots

Motorola Razr Fold

Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 with 16GB RAM — fast for everyday use and surprisingly good in long sessions, but the choice of the non-Elite chip in a $1,899 phone is the headline criticism.

• Motorola stuck Qualcomm's excellent Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 (16GB RAM, 512GB) inside its first full-fold flagship.
• With a phone this expensive it is a bit disappointing Motorola couldn't go all the way with the Elite chip.
• In a 20-minute stress test the Z Fold 7's 8 Elite was ~10% better on the first loop, but the Razr Fold ran better through the 20 minutes and ended ~20% ahead on sustained performance with similar thermals.
• Recording 4K120 for a long time makes the Snapdragon CPU run quite hot, though it cools down fairly fast.
• The non-Elite chip, 243g weight and IP49 dust rating could be causes for concern, even if the experience is smooth.

Samsung Galaxy S26+

Both chip variants — Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (US/China) and Exynos 2600 (rest of world) — deliver flagship-grade benchmarks and smooth real-world performance. The Exynos throttles harder under sustained load and consumes a touch more battery than the Snapdragon, but day-to-day use is indistinguishable.

• Geekbench 6: 3,028–3,149 single-core and 10,086–10,877 multi-core on the Exynos 2600 — outperforms the Pixel 10 Pro and trades blows with iPhone 17 Pro in multi-core
• 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 6,958 points peak — flagship-tier GPU performance, beats iPhone 17 Pro outright, lags only the Snapdragon S26 Ultra
• Exynos 2600 Wild Life sustained-performance score is 52.8% — significant thermal throttling drops the chip to roughly half peak performance after 20 minutes under load
• BGMI holds 118–120 fps consistently for extended sessions with no jitter; Zenless Zone Zero stays locked at 60 fps with high settings — gaming is genuinely smooth in real workloads
• Exynos 2600 power consumption is ~10–15% higher than the Snapdragon S25+ for the same workloads, contributing to slightly shorter battery life under load

Motorola Razr Fold

The standout: the largest battery in the book-foldable space delivering class-leading endurance, plus 80W wired charging — three times faster than the Galaxy Z Fold 7.

• Lasting an impressive 14 hours 31 minutes, the Razr Fold is officially the best notebook-style foldable for battery life (16h10m with refresh-rate optimized).
• The Galaxy Z Fold 7 managed only 10h44m in the same test, with a 4,400mAh battery versus the Razr Fold's 6,000mAh cell.
• I found the battery basically impossible to kill in a single day, even with the Fold's hotspot supplying an entire office internet connection over 12 days.
• It charges at 80W wired — over three times as fast as the Galaxy Z Fold 7's 25W — plus 50W wireless and 5W reverse, with a 90W charger and a case included in the box.
• The 6,000mAh cell is colossal — about 20% larger than the Pixel 10 Pro Fold's — though there's also more display to power.
• If you use the camera a lot or run games, the battery does drain quite quickly and you may need an afternoon top-up.

Samsung Galaxy S26+

The flashpoint of every review. The 4,900 mAh cell is unchanged from the S25+ and lab tests put the S26+ comfortably in 'reliable all-day' territory — but Chinese rivals with silicon-carbon batteries (OnePlus 15, Oppo Find X9 Pro) now run 50–70% longer in the same tests. 45W wired and 20W wireless charging are competitive within Samsung's lineup but slow versus the OnePlus 15's 100W.

• GSMArena Active Use Score: 16h 25min — a 2-hour improvement over the S25+ thanks to chipset efficiency, putting the S26+ on par with the S26 Ultra
• PhoneArena measured 18h 23min web browsing, 9h 48min video, and 10h 18min 3D gaming — comfortably all-day for typical users with some buffer
• Notebookcheck's 150-nit Wi-Fi browsing test ran 17h 45min — solid in isolation, but ~2 hours behind the Snapdragon-powered S25+ in the same test
• OnePlus 15 (7,300 mAh silicon-carbon) lasts 30h 7min on the same GSMArena test vs the S26+'s 18 hours — Samsung's refusal to adopt silicon-carbon chemistry is now a real disadvantage
• 45W wired charging takes ~51–63 minutes for a full 0–100% — 67% in 30 minutes, fine but unremarkable compared to OnePlus 15's 100W (45min full)

Motorola Razr Fold

At $1,899 it undercuts the Z Fold 7 and is the only premium book foldable many US buyers can actually purchase — value hinges on whether the non-Elite chip and update questions matter to you.

• At $1,899.99 / £1,799.99 it undercuts the Galaxy Z Fold 7 by about $100/£100, and the pre-order Moto Pen Ultra bundle adds real value — the sum of its parts is the best foldable on the market.
• If you're tired of Samsung-only or have no interest in the Pixel Fold, this may be the best folding phone you can get in the US right now — the Oppo Find N6 and Honor Magic V6 aren't available there.
• It could be called a disappointment, especially compared to the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold and Honor Magic V5 — it should have offered something more compelling to stand out.
• If Motorola drops the price by even two or three hundred dollars within the first few weeks, this phone suddenly becomes a much stronger contender.
• It competes fairly well with the Oppo Find N6, which is amazing to see.

Samsung Galaxy S26+

Starting at $1,099 / £1,099 with 256 GB (no 128 GB option), the S26+ has the hardest pitch in Samsung's lineup. The base Galaxy S26 saves $200 and gives up only the bigger screen and 4,900 mAh battery; the Ultra adds dramatically better cameras, Privacy Display, S Pen, and 60W charging for $200 more. Outside Samsung, the OnePlus 15 and Google Pixel 10 each undercut the Plus on the things it doesn't excel at.

• $1,099 / £1,099 starting price for 256 GB is $100 / £100 more than the S25+ at launch — the worst price-to-upgrade ratio in the lineup
• Only $200 separates the Plus from the Ultra, which adds the 200 MP main + 50 MP 5x telephoto cameras, Privacy Display, S Pen, 60W wired charging, 5,000 mAh battery, and Snapdragon-only chipset globally
• OnePlus 15 starts at $899 with a 7,300 mAh battery, faster 100W charging, and broadly competitive cameras — a stronger raw-spec value at the same price tier
• Google Pixel 10 is $100 cheaper at $999 and includes integrated Qi2 magnets, plus arguably better cameras for skin tones and moving subjects — though only 128 GB base