Oppo Find X9 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy S26+

Oppo Find X9 Ultra

A 6.8-inch LTPO OLED with up to 144Hz and very high real-world brightness — among the brightest screens on any phone outdoors.

• 6.8-inch LTPO OLED panel up to 144Hz, with a maximum brightness around 1,800 nits and dimming as low as 1 nit.
• Hits a staggering ~3,600 nits of peak HDR brightness, making it incredibly easy to see and edit shots in direct sunlight.
• In manual mode the display peaks at 840 nits, rising to ~1,156 nits in auto on a 75% white patch and up to ~1,932 nits in the native gallery app.
• The smoother 144Hz panel and 3,600-nit brightness outperform Samsung's display.

Samsung Galaxy S26+

Reviewers universally rate the S26+ display as elite — sharp QHD+, fast adaptive 120Hz LTPO, excellent HDR, more-than-enough outdoor brightness — but note Samsung carried the panel forward from the S25+ with effectively zero changes. The Ultra now has the differentiating Privacy Display; the Plus does not.

• 6.7-inch LTPO AMOLED at 3120×1440 (516 ppi) is the sharpest in the lineup — even sharper than the larger Ultra panel on a per-inch basis
• Peak HDR brightness measured at 2,596 nits in a 10% window (1,498 nits at 75% fill) — bright enough for clear outdoor use and great HDR streaming on Netflix and YouTube
• Phone Arena's CalMAN suite measured 2,377 nits high-APL, 0.9 nit minimum, and gave the Plus an 8/10 display score — slightly behind the Ultra and iPhone 17 Pro on absolute brightness but ahead on viewing-angle consistency
• ProScaler (image sharpening) and mDNIe (gradient smoothing) add subtle but appreciable improvements to lower-resolution content and gradients
• PWM dimming is only 240–480 Hz — users sensitive to screen flicker (eye strain, headaches) may find Samsung less comfortable than rivals like Honor at ~4,000 Hz
• No Privacy Display — Samsung reserved its standout new screen tech for the Ultra, leaving the Plus with an excellent but otherwise unchanged panel
• Display is essentially the same panel as the S25+ and S24+ — Samsung is iterating on processing rather than the underlying hardware

Oppo Find X9 Ultra

The reason to buy it. A Hasselblad-tuned quad system with the most versatile zoom on any phone, a true 10x optical periscope and an optional 300mm Hasselblad teleconverter. Near-universally praised, with only minor sharpness and ultrawide caveats.

• A 200MP main, 200MP 3x telephoto, 50MP 10x optical telephoto and 50MP ultrawide, all Hasselblad-branded — camera-first overkill in the best way.
• Consistently great photos, sharpness and dynamic range with really good color calibration — this phone did basically everything right in the camera department; an incredibly well-rounded smartphone camera.
• Is this the best camera phone ever built? — my new favorite camera phone and one of the best Android phones I've ever used.
• Even after a direct shootout, still the best camera phone I've ever used.
• Detail is very good, but sharpness remains a bit underwhelming on the main camera.
• The ultrawide is probably the weakest part of the setup — with the first three cameras taking so much space, Oppo reused the Samsung GN5 sensor here.
• Night-mode processing — color, contrast and exposure handling — is so much better than the Galaxy S26 Ultra's, and the ultrawide is now one of the best for detail preservation.
• The optional 300mm Hasselblad teleconverter delivers ~13x (300mm) optical-feel zoom that retains real telephoto sharpness, extending to ~60x (1380mm).

Samsung Galaxy S26+

The most-criticised aspect of the phone. The S26+ uses the same 50 MP main + 12 MP ultrawide + 10 MP 3x telephoto array Samsung has shipped since the S22+ — fine for landscapes and well-lit shots, mediocre in low light, and frustrating for moving subjects. Software adds Horizontal Lock video and natural-language Photo Assist edits, but the hardware ceiling is showing.

• Same sensors as the S25+, S24+, S23+, and S22+ — Samsung has reused this camera array for five consecutive generations, relying on image-processing improvements for inter-generational gains
• Daylight stills look balanced and natural — colours lean accurate rather than Samsung's old over-saturated style, skies stay realistic, and dynamic range is decent
• PhoneArena's standardised camera test scored the S26+ at 149/158 combined — slightly above the S25+ thanks to processing upgrades, but well behind the Ultra and Chinese rivals
• Low-light performance shows visible colour noise, occasionally blown highlights, and smudgy halos around bright sources — usable but no longer competitive
• Motion blur on moving subjects (kids, pets) is the recurring deal-breaker — Samsung favours a low shutter speed for light gathering, ruining roughly half of action shots

Oppo Find X9 Ultra

Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 puts it near the top of the benchmark charts, but sustained-load stability is mediocre and Oppo deliberately throttles early to control heat.

• As expected, the Find X9 Ultra earns excellent benchmark scores near the top of the charts.
• A 3D ultrasonic fingerprint scanner Oppo claims is 35% faster and 33% more reliable, plus vapor cooling to dissipate heat through the aluminium frame for better sustained performance.
• 3DMark returned ~7,530 best-loop and ~3,682 low-loop with only ~49% stability, and peak performance didn't last a minute — weak sustained behaviour.
• Genshin Impact stayed consistently above 50fps and remained smooth even when throttling to ~30fps after ~16 minutes at 41.5°C, at under 4W power draw.
• Honor of Kings averaged 144fps over 30 minutes at max settings; Genshin held max 60fps before stabilizing near 50fps.

Samsung Galaxy S26+

Both chip variants — Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (US/China) and Exynos 2600 (rest of world) — deliver flagship-grade benchmarks and smooth real-world performance. The Exynos throttles harder under sustained load and consumes a touch more battery than the Snapdragon, but day-to-day use is indistinguishable.

• Geekbench 6: 3,028–3,149 single-core and 10,086–10,877 multi-core on the Exynos 2600 — outperforms the Pixel 10 Pro and trades blows with iPhone 17 Pro in multi-core
• 3DMark Wild Life Extreme: 6,958 points peak — flagship-tier GPU performance, beats iPhone 17 Pro outright, lags only the Snapdragon S26 Ultra
• Exynos 2600 Wild Life sustained-performance score is 52.8% — significant thermal throttling drops the chip to roughly half peak performance after 20 minutes under load
• BGMI holds 118–120 fps consistently for extended sessions with no jitter; Zenless Zone Zero stays locked at 60 fps with high settings — gaming is genuinely smooth in real workloads
• Exynos 2600 power consumption is ~10–15% higher than the Snapdragon S25+ for the same workloads, contributing to slightly shorter battery life under load

Oppo Find X9 Ultra

A genuine highlight: a 7,050mAh silicon-carbon cell that posts some of the best endurance numbers of any 2026 flagship, with fast 100W wired and 50W wireless charging.

• Draws power from a 7,050mAh battery — a sizeable increase over the previous generation — with 100W SuperVOOC wired and 50W AirVOOC wireless charging.
• Earned an active-use battery score of over 20 hours; with the SuperVOOC charger it went 0–75% in 30 minutes and to full in 45 minutes.
• After ~10 hours of continuous use starting at 7am it still had 53% battery, regularly getting 8–9 hours of screen-on time and ~40% left after a 13-hour day.
• A PCMark synthetic loop returned 15 hours 2 minutes, and 100W SuperVOOC charging took ~49–52 minutes (the charger isn't included).
• With moderate usage you can easily expect more than 2 days of battery life — Oppo finally feels like a truly complete product.
• Charges 0–100% in about 52 minutes on the official 80W charger in a head-to-head charge test.

Samsung Galaxy S26+

The flashpoint of every review. The 4,900 mAh cell is unchanged from the S25+ and lab tests put the S26+ comfortably in 'reliable all-day' territory — but Chinese rivals with silicon-carbon batteries (OnePlus 15, Oppo Find X9 Pro) now run 50–70% longer in the same tests. 45W wired and 20W wireless charging are competitive within Samsung's lineup but slow versus the OnePlus 15's 100W.

• GSMArena Active Use Score: 16h 25min — a 2-hour improvement over the S25+ thanks to chipset efficiency, putting the S26+ on par with the S26 Ultra
• PhoneArena measured 18h 23min web browsing, 9h 48min video, and 10h 18min 3D gaming — comfortably all-day for typical users with some buffer
• Notebookcheck's 150-nit Wi-Fi browsing test ran 17h 45min — solid in isolation, but ~2 hours behind the Snapdragon-powered S25+ in the same test
• OnePlus 15 (7,300 mAh silicon-carbon) lasts 30h 7min on the same GSMArena test vs the S26+'s 18 hours — Samsung's refusal to adopt silicon-carbon chemistry is now a real disadvantage
• 45W wired charging takes ~51–63 minutes for a full 0–100% — 67% in 30 minutes, fine but unremarkable compared to OnePlus 15's 100W (45min full)

Oppo Find X9 Ultra

Premium-priced and hard to buy in many markets, but reviewers broadly conclude it out-cameras the S26 Ultra and Pixel and edges the Vivo X300 Ultra on usability.

• Its main compromises are the ~€1,699 price, large 236g body, occasional software concerns and limited availability in some markets.
• It feels like Oppo wanted to make the camera first and just happened to also create the best Android phone you can get right now — though it won't win every year-end award.
• The base Find X9 Ultra starts at 7,499 yuan in China — roughly £814 / ~$1,100 — but the heaviness and visual pressure are the first impression.
• The closest rival is the Vivo X300 Ultra, but the X9 Ultra wins by having a more user-friendly OS.
• The Hasselblad alliance delivers a phone that genuinely challenges the Galaxy S26 Ultra on cameras.

Samsung Galaxy S26+

Starting at $1,099 / £1,099 with 256 GB (no 128 GB option), the S26+ has the hardest pitch in Samsung's lineup. The base Galaxy S26 saves $200 and gives up only the bigger screen and 4,900 mAh battery; the Ultra adds dramatically better cameras, Privacy Display, S Pen, and 60W charging for $200 more. Outside Samsung, the OnePlus 15 and Google Pixel 10 each undercut the Plus on the things it doesn't excel at.

• $1,099 / £1,099 starting price for 256 GB is $100 / £100 more than the S25+ at launch — the worst price-to-upgrade ratio in the lineup
• Only $200 separates the Plus from the Ultra, which adds the 200 MP main + 50 MP 5x telephoto cameras, Privacy Display, S Pen, 60W wired charging, 5,000 mAh battery, and Snapdragon-only chipset globally
• OnePlus 15 starts at $899 with a 7,300 mAh battery, faster 100W charging, and broadly competitive cameras — a stronger raw-spec value at the same price tier
• Google Pixel 10 is $100 cheaper at $999 and includes integrated Qi2 magnets, plus arguably better cameras for skin tones and moving subjects — though only 128 GB base